GunnerShy
Well-Known Member
Reading the Chelsea statement they've rejected the pay cut because they want to come back at a later date and renegotiate a larger one that the 3.3% the players offered presumably based on the (then) known impact. Not unlike Özil's position really.So Chelsea have rejected a pay cut from their players, meanwhile Aston Villa agree a 4 month deferral.
Arsenal getting their begging bowl out to their players for a pay cut over ONE YEAR looks pretty off atm, especially when you consider Arsenal champions itself as one of the best run clubs in England.
I agree it's strange we were so quick to agree one given that it may need to be revisited!