Highbury_2006
Village Idiot
I still want Alexis to stay but he seems to be a very greedy man.
If he wanted to win he'd join Celtic. It's all about the money and the glory for him now.Wage demands again? What happened to 'Alexis just wants to win'?
Ah..Fake news done it again!Wenger labeled this whole thing "media imagination." That would seem to indicate that Alexis hasn't been not-so-secretly meeting with PSG's owners in Paris (which they couldn't legally do without Arsenal's permission anyway). And they can't legally strike a deal with the player for next year at this point either. Not until January under FIFA rules. It's all been fake news emanating from a bogus Twitter account.
Again, Arsenal doesn't receive the prime rate on investments (though it's definitely more correct than the .25% you originally quoted). The prime rate helps determine the operative #, but it's not by itself relevant to the club unless the club is generating less than 1.25% ROI per annum -- not sure how many times I have to explain this. Google CAPM, WACC, etc.
And as for your estimation of our CL chances, that's totally specious reasoning -- we wouldn't have a 0% chance without him, and, as this season proved, we sure as hell don't have a 100% chance (of making that last spot) with him. The exact % is conjecture, of course, but the only number it's very obviously not is 100%.
If any post is "garbage," it's yours -- I'd suggest staying in your lane, as you have literally no clue what you're talking about.
Where did I mention beating the market? EMH has little to no bearing here. Spouting off basic concepts you remember from university isn't really adding much, nor is calling my calculation of "utility" ("EV" would probably be a better term, as I didn't inhere non-cash value) "invalid as well as...unsound" without providing justification.So you believe in the efficient market hypothesis applied to world football? Sounds like you have a bit of an outdated and/or misplaced way of looking at things through neo-classical economics.
The way you tried to calculate expected utility was invalid as well as being unsound.
Where did I mention beating the market? EMH has little to no bearing here. Spouting off basic concepts you remember from university isn't really adding much, nor is calling my calculation of "utility" ("EV" would probably be a better term, as I didn't inhere non-cash value) "invalid as well as...unsound" without providing justification.
Don't worry, we didn't expect much from someone who can't spell Cameron.Everyone on this forum has an Economics degree. And I'm just sitting here trying to figure out what net spend is: