AshburtonGhost
Well-Known Member
longrufus said:Seriously under what rationale? The only logical thing I can think of is that he was on the pitch for longer.AshburtonGhost said:Eduardo was poor but yes, Theo was worse.
Honestly, that is probably part of it and that at least Eduardo hit the target with one chance and got in behind the defence a couple of times. Theo on the other hand dead set touched the ball twice in the first half and was completely inconsequential until his substitution in the second. Yes, it is probably splitting hairs as they were both terrible, but Theo was worse, he doesn't even look like doing anything at the moment.