Country: Australia
outlaw_member said:I think Celestis mentioned that we need a goalscoring midfielder, but he also went on to say that the balance within the midfield was now right. So my question is, isn't our midfield now seemingly balanced partly in due to the fact that we no longer have a hungry midfielder constantly vacating his position in search for goals? I'm not suggesting that we shouldn't require goals from midfield, but the aggression with which any potential CAM looks for goals is also important.
Also, another point I wanted to address was in reference to Arteta making safe but offensive passes, which was a contrast to say Song's somewhat risky but offensive passes. In my opinion, the difference between Arteta and say Fabregas or even Wilshere, is that the former retains his position after completing a forward pass. Therefore, the possibility of the ball being lost does not make us vulnerable, as Arteta is still behind the ball in a defensive stance. This is a huge contrast to Fabregas and Wilshere, both of whom would not only make offensive passes, but also continue moving forward, thus making us vulnerable when we lost possession. This is a massive gripe I had against Fabregas, as he always continued running, even though he had just attempted a risky pass. Wilshere does the same thing, and the issue is that if the ball is lost, we now have one less midfielder behind the ball. Arteta on the other hand holds his ground, and it makes us that much more stronger defensively.
I think the one area where if we improve 5% these matches would not be such a struggle is the midfielder supporting the attack . Ramsey and Rosicky are very competent in a lot of ways but they just lack that little bit of magic to push us over the line when RVP is not firing .