DJ_Markstar
Based and Artetapilled
Player:Martinelli
It will basically hand ManUre the league every year, and that's a good enough reason to not want it, in my opinion.
scytheavatar said:Anzac said:On 29 March 2012 FIGC announced the annual report for Italian football,[112] which showed that only six clubs produced a profit during the 2010–11 season with an aggregate net loss of €428 million and negative equity of €204 million[113]
That's probably better than many other league, I am not sure if England has 6 clubs which are in the black. And like I said obviously not all clubs are run poorly, Napoli is one of the best examples of a club that everyone should emulate and aspire to be, read this:
<a class="postlink" href="http://swissramble.blogspot.sg/search/label/Napoli" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://swissramble.blogspot.sg/search/label/Napoli</a>" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
What would they have learnt?Idiots learnt nothing from the Super League
What would they have learnt?
They didn't oppose the super league because of any grassroots reasons, they opposed it because it would have hit their finances and control.
United hit with 300k euros and Barcelona with 500k euros fines.
Bit of a joke tbh.
I read the article, ours was due to not having the same revenues during Covid and therefore our expenditure; wages, club expenses etc couldn't be covered by what would be our usual revenue, so it was deemed a minor break-even deficit and was back to normal after Covid.
Nothing like City who had 115 charges or Barcelona that was reporting false statements.
Still?
You are paying multiple players over 300k in salary per week.
If it's proportionate to the revenue then that's fine under FFP, which is the case as a massive club. But most of our revenue is match-based and this took a hit under Covid.