outlaw_member
Established Member
Klaus Daimler said:The thing is that most fans were perfectly content with Almunia last season though (he was voted player of the season on Arsenal-Mania by quite some distance, even), and when we were linked to Chamakh last summer not a single poster wanted him except for me and ricky. Hindsight is great, but one or two signings wouldn't have made much difference when we lost so many players to injuries in the end.Rocafella said:Blowing his trumpet about Vermaelen, although leaving us with two poor goalkeepers and without a direct replacement for an injured van Persie for the majority of the season.
There were also many critics of Almunia and for many of us it was more of a resignation that he is what we will have to contend with, as opposed to having real belief that he will become a valuable player. Irrespective of that, whoever did have faith in him were obviously wrong in doing so. Wenger is paid millions to judge the players at his diposal and he horribly misjudged not one, but two of his goalkeepers. Managers don't have the excuse of hindsight, which is why they are paid so much money. Wenger showed great foresight to envisage Vermaelen's impact, but on the other hand he failed to judge Almunia's.
Plus, he well and truly cocked up with Chamakh and the 15 million we saved on him could have been the difference between the league and ending up trophyless. There really aren't any excuses to have been so stingy in that situation when we had sold our first choice striker, and being able to sign the replacement a year later wasn't exactly going to benefit us this season. As Chelsea fans prepare to potentially celebrate their first ever Double, we can all elate in having saved money on Chamakh. Thankfully, Wenger did manage to get some things right but he failed to address certain other problems which ultimately undermined our whole season.