• ! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !

    Discussions about police investigations

    In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.

    Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.

Premier League 2023/24: Our Race Is Run

Where do we finish in 23/24?


  • Total voters
    307
Status
Not open for further replies.

fute

Active Member

Country: USA
City's dominance is boring because Pep's style of play is boring to watch. When the dominant team plays as boring as they do, it makes it less interesting.

He is a great manager. He has a gravy job. Boat load of money behind him. Free from any consequence unlike Everton and Forrest. 🤔 And really no pressure. He manages at City, not United.

Not really worried about City though. Klopp did just fine at Pool. Won a PL and won the same amount of CL titles as Pep did at City: 1.

Pool spent money, developed players, and developed their academy. Their fans accepted it and are sad to see him go. That is the model for us. Not City.

We are the best PL team this year. Whether we win the title this year remains to be seen. Our time will come.
 

dka1

100% Dark Chocolate
Trusted ⭐

Country: England
Sp**s will not help us. If they do you can change my username to The_malodorous_git.

Excited I Like It GIF by LA Clippers
 

dka1

100% Dark Chocolate
Trusted ⭐

Country: England
His net spend in his first 2 seasons at City was 400m and frankly we should probably count the season prior in that as well because they had already hired his mate from Barca as DOF and bought KDB, Otamendi and Sterling for him because they knew they were getting him in the following season. He is remarkably disingenuous. The only reason their net spend is comparable to ours now is because we've been trying to play catchup in the last few seasons without world class surplus players to sell in order to offset our costs. They benefitted from hoarding players and being able to essentially roll over the enormous outlay of numerous windows into fees that make them look more financially prudent than they really are. It's exactly what Boehly has been doing at Chelsea.

Yeah Pep is full of sh!te tbh.

Imagine him pulling up one day with a wig and trying to pretend like it's his natural hair. Sure maybe his wife and some of his family members might indulge in his fanasies (and that's a push) but everybody else knows he's a fraud.

I had a point somewhere there but I've lost it. But basically, again - he's full of sh!t. Banging his knuckles as if we all don't know City were STACKED when he took over.
 

Batman

Head of the Wayne foundation for benching Nketiah

Country: USA

Player:Saliba
Yeah Pep is full of sh!te tbh.

Imagine him pulling up one day with a wig and trying to pretend like it's his natural hair. Sure maybe his wife and some of his family members might indulge in his fanasies (and that's a push) but everybody else knows he's a fraud.

I had a point somewhere there but I've lost it. But basically, again - he's full of sh!t. Banging his knuckles as if we all don't know City were STACKED when he took over.
He's a clown. These statements are more to himself out loud to cope with his own insecurity than anything else. That man is rattled that Arteta has caught up to him this quickly. He was rattled when he tried to sign Rice and failed, he was rattled after they lost in the Community Shield, he was rattled after they lost at the Emirates and he was extra rattled after they couldn't score against us at the Etihad. As soon as our concrete primary targets emerge, I would be shocked if he doesn't try to buy at least one of them, the bald, odious, cheating turd.
 

Badger_Revenge

Active Member
Everyone is citing transfer fees for Man City, but that is only a small portion of what they spend and a terrible basis for comparison. Salaries (+bonuses) are way more consequential to annual spend, and Pep (and most of the press) knows it. Salaries are also not independent of transfer fees because the promise of high salary can convince the player to transfer, reducing the negotiating leverage of the selling club.

A May 3 Athletic article has Man City spending 500 million pounds on transfers and salaries in 22/23, and Arsenal only 326 million pounds - also well behind Man U (453), Liverpool (412), and Chelsea (539). From that point of view, Arsenal look pretty efficient.
 

Fallout

Active Member
Most likely he has deluded himself into believing he is the good guy of his own story

Everything he says boils down to a cry to be respected

He knows deep down he'll never truly get that respect

Overall a pathetic and tragic character
 

UpTheGunnerz

Vrei sa pleci dar una una iei

Player:Elneny
Most likely he has deluded himself into believing he is the good guy of his own story

Everything he says boils down to a cry to be respected

He knows deep down he'll never truly get that respect

Overall a pathetic and tragic character

Who are you talking about
 

Macho

DJ Machodemiks
Dusted 🔻

Country: England
Everyone is citing transfer fees for Man City, but that is only a small portion of what they spend and a terrible basis for comparison. Salaries (+bonuses) are way more consequential to annual spend, and Pep (and most of the press) knows it. Salaries are also not independent of transfer fees because the promise of high salary can convince the player to transfer, reducing the negotiating leverage of the selling club.

A May 3 Athletic article has Man City spending 500 million pounds on transfers and salaries in 22/23, and Arsenal only 326 million pounds - also well behind Man U (453), Liverpool (412), and Chelsea (539). From that point of view, Arsenal look pretty efficient.

There is absolutely nothing you can point to that proves City spent more than Arsenal/Utd/Chelsea in the past few years. Pep said it with chest and nobody has corrected him.

From time you guys are only including this or adding that, already lets you know that this is all just cope.

Why this desperation to prove Arsenal spent less I don’t even get, Arsenal spent nearly 200 mil on Rice and Havertz alone which is a joke within itself.
 

Tir Na Nog

Changes Opinion Every 5 Minutes

Country: Ireland
United and Chelsea have definitely spent enough to rival City but they're both so horribly managed. Meanwhile we've definitely really upped our spending recently. Probably not enough to say we should be outright winning it but it's no surprise were competitors
 

HattoriHanzo

Active Member

Country: Croatia
If you seriously believe any figures that come out of that club, then I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
He probably believes that they paid for Haaland only 60 million euros (official value).
If this is true, I wonder why 115 FC was the only club interested to buy him for such a low figure.
Well, some people believe in Santa Claus, good for them if this makes them happy.

Any financial number coming from 115 FC is fake.
They (including Pep) know that they are cheats, we all know that they are cheats.

The only question that remains is if UK government will let independent commission to do their job and punish them adequately without political interference (which I doubt).
 

LookingForEric

Patronize me again and I'll destroy you 😖

Country: Northern Ireland
Arteta first summer - £75M
Second summer - £145M
Third summer + winter - £160M

So roughly £380M spent to challenge for the league, very impressive. We of course spent a further £200M recently to win it, and we’ve got much closer. The key thing is after every summer of spending we are getting BETTER. Look at United etc, they spend and they always get worse.
 

LookingForEric

Patronize me again and I'll destroy you 😖

Country: Northern Ireland
Since 19/20 -

Villa - £515M spent on players
Sp**s - £695M spent on players
United - £775M spent on players
West Ham - £490M spent on players

Have we spent a good amount of money? Of course we have. But so has everyone else in the top 10, we’ve just spent it far better than anyone else. Big props to Edu and Mikel for that.
 

HattoriHanzo

Active Member

Country: Croatia
He's a clown. These statements are more to himself out loud to cope with his own insecurity than anything else. That man is rattled that Arteta has caught up to him this quickly. He was rattled when he tried to sign Rice and failed, he was rattled after they lost in the Community Shield, he was rattled after they lost at the Emirates and he was extra rattled after they couldn't score against us at the Etihad. As soon as our concrete primary targets emerge, I would be shocked if he doesn't try to buy at least one of them, the bald, odious, cheating turd.
He wanted to sign also Bellingham last summer, and Bellingham told him to f..k off.
Smart young man.

Now he wants Musiala, Wirtz, Paqueta, Guimaraes and God know who else.
Not so difficult to win all trophies with these players.
 

Blood on the Tracks

AG's best friend, role model and mentor.
Trusted ⭐

Country: England

Player:Rice
Point is to elevate yourself up from upper midtable or even top 4 challengers to consistent title challenger, you have to spend money and huge amounts of it. There's no way around that.

After this summer I expect us to be in the one in one out mode when it comes to transfers and there will be little to no deadwood in the squad. The books will balance much better.

Pep inherited a phenomenal squad, it's no surprise that his net spend hasn't been so excessive, it hasn't needed to be.

You're not dealing with clubs on the same footing, it matters hugely where your starting point was and Arsenals was much lower than the one Pep inherited.

If you just look at numbers without context you're not getting the real picture.
 
Last edited:

HattoriHanzo

Active Member

Country: Croatia
There is absolutely nothing you can point to that proves City spent more than Arsenal/Utd/Chelsea in the past few years. Pep said it with chest and nobody has corrected him.

From time you guys are only including this or adding that, already lets you know that this is all just cope.

Why this desperation to prove Arsenal spent less I don’t even get, Arsenal spent nearly 200 mil on Rice and Havertz alone which is a joke within itself.
If 170 million is nearly 200 million, than you're correct.
Why do you want so desperately to prove Arsenal spent more?

Here is the list of transfer spend since 2019/20.
Transfer spend

115 FC spent more then Arsenal, and also sold more than Arsenal, so that their balance is better than ours.
Now remind me the squads Arsenal and City had in 2019/2020.
Did you expect that Arsenal and Arteta compete with 115 FC without spending more that them?
 

HattoriHanzo

Active Member

Country: Croatia
Point is to elevate yourself up from upper midtable or even top 4 challengers to consistent title challenger, you have to spend money and huge amounts of it. There's no way around that.

After this summer I expect us to be in the one in one out mode when it comes to transfers and there will be little to no deadwood in the squad. The books will balance much better.

Pep inherited a phenomenal squad, it's no surprise that his net spend hasn't been so excessive, it hasn't needed to be.

If you just look at numbers without context you're not getting the real picture.
Many on this forum don't want to see the real picture because it doesn't suit their agenda.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Arsenal Quotes

If Ryan Giggs is worth 20 millions, Bergkamp is worth 100 million

Marco Van Basten

Daily Transfer Updates

Tuesday, May 28

Arsenal have been handed a boost as Sporting Lisbon have lowered their asking price for CB Ousmane Diomande from €80m to €60m [Record]

Sheffield Wednesday are keen on signing 21 year old striker Mika Biereth on loan [The Sheffield Star]

Arsenal hope to command a sizeable fee for Eddie Nketiah this summer [The Athletic]

Arsenal and AC Milan are interested in Monaco midfielder Youssouf Fofana [Gazzetta]

Thomas Partey’s preference is to stay at Arsenal, but no talks have taken place over a new contract with one year left and the club could consider offers this summer [Charles Watts]

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom