Country: England
Jeez, has your mod application come good bro?
No I'm just practicing.
Jeez, has your mod application come good bro?
Wicked, I'll be watching out for the impartiality of your posts.No I'm just practicing.
But the evidence isn't flimsy.We're different people.
Never been interested in speculations built on flimsy evidence. People make one assumption, then another, then another and before you know it, they're obssessed about something that's built on sand. That's how lynch mob's work and why people believe in the paranormal and deities.
There's plenty of data in football for people to use in their arguments. But the main problem is that people don't like what the data shows. So they have to mock statistics to keep their narrative.
You mentioned defence. If you think a defence looks tactically poor on the pitch, you look to see if we're shipping goals. If we are, it supports your observations .. like this season. But if we're keeping clean sheets and not conceding goals only an idiot keeps saying our defence is sh*t. That's what happened in 2015/16 . . the waffle on this forum was unbearable.
I don't think that is funny. Maybe you should be banned for collusion!He did have a point though.
You can't call someone names just because you disagree with them. Besides, why single her out? A lot of people have made similar comments.He did have a point though.
If you say so. I'd say negotiating in good faith and shifting the goal posts is completely the same regardless of who the player is and their worth.This is nothing like the Higauin situation tbf.
But the club made it clear from the beginning they wanted Mkhitaryan as part exchange. That would obviously include cash because there's no way that the two players have a similar value, regardless of Alexis' contract situation. Shifting of the goal posts would insinuate that they made demands after a deal had been agreed, but they've been up front since the start. Surely United weren't naive enough to think that this would be a straight swap?If you say so. I'd say negotiating in good faith and shifting the goal posts is completely the same regardless of who the player is and their worth.
You can't call someone names just because you disagree with them. Besides, why single her out? A lot of people have made similar comments.
I don't know how they can think a straight swap is fine anyway. Alexis is worth triple what Mhki is worth as a player. They need him desperately to make a step up.
I am a busy man. But i will be a nice boy if people stop mocking my club.
I don't know because the speculation has been rife. City offers 20m we want 35m, United come into the equation rumour of Alexis swapping with Martial and us giving United cash as well changed to a straight swap between Alexis and Mkhitaryan to now the former plus United giving us cash.But the club made it clear from the beginning they wanted Mkhitaryan as part exchange. That would obviously include cash because there's no way that the two players have a similar value, regardless of Alexis' contract situation. Shifting of the goal posts would insinuate that they made demands after a deal had been agreed, but they've been up front since the start. Surely United weren't naive enough to think that this would be a straight swap?
*ArseholeAre you really an Arsenal fan? Asshole.
That's the only place I'd disagree, I think Mkhi's stock as gone down quite a bit in his time at United (rightly or wrongly). They are reportedly willing to spend £35m on Alexis in a cash only deal so if we assume Mkhi is a £25m player, adding £10m to the deal with him is not unreasonable.Are United being niave I'm not so certain they may well feel that in this market a proven player like Mkhitaryan has retained a lot of his value and Alexis may have lost some of his given City offered only 20m for him and no more. They are usually the ones pushing prices up not down.
And I hope this forum will stop discussing squad cost.I still have hope he will stay!
That's the only place I'd disagree, I think Mkhi's stock as gone down quite a bit in his time at United (rightly or wrongly). They are reportedly willing to spend £35m on Alexis in a cash only deal so if we assume Mkhi is a £25m player, adding £10m to the deal with him is not unreasonable.
Six months is a long time in football.Maybe because Alexis has 5 months left on his contract? Just a thought.