outlaw_member said:Nasri is another example. We essentially prolonged his ineffective form by sticking with him through thick and thin. There was no pressure placed on him to pull himself out of the rut. He suffered no punishment whatsoever for strolling through games.
Not just Nasri either, although I think the players are given extra leeway/time because they are constantly adapting to new positions & roles.
Nasri was an AMC when we signed him, then we used him as LW in a 442 until we signed AA. Since then he's been played as RWF, AMC & LWF & all before he's fully matured/developed as a player. He looked like he was finally settling into a position/role & had a run of form that had the pundits referring to him as the best player in the PL this season. Then AW decided to drop AA & moved Nasri to accomodate Theo, & Nasri has never been the same since.
Song is another at the same age who's position & role has changed in each of the last 3 seasons & the same holds for Cesc. Add to this that the midfield is the guts of the team & play & we've seen changes in shape, roles & players = no stability.
AW talks of this as player flexibility towards Total Football interchange, but the reality is that it dumbs down players towards a generic type of jack-of-all-trades as they never get the chance to learn a position/role well enough to excell at anything.
IMO AW moving our best player at the time smacks of playing favourites, as does his obsession with Cesc as AMC in a single striker formation. It also suggests he is willing to compromise the team capability in favour of individual 'requirements'.