DasBootist
Well-Known Member
Man United's expenditures were from money earned by the club, unlike Man City.
This City team is basically Guardiola playing real life Fm.
This City team is basically Guardiola playing real life Fm.
That and the $$ injected isn’t exactly earned (by nation-state backers) in the most moral manner.Man United's expenditures were from money earned by the club, unlike Man City.
This City team is basically Guardiola playing real life Fm.
That's a question between you and your god. I'm just his messenger.Go on then, I'll bite, why, exactly, in your opinion, do we 'have no soul'?
The why is your stadium empty every fecking week?It's entirely the fault of City, really? Our record signing cost £35m LESS than Pogba and Lukaku, £146m less than Neymar.
Ferguson broke the transfer record more times than any other manager in the top flight, paying £30m for players nearly TWENTY years ago.
I can assure you, our club still very much has a soul, and always will have, despite the bitterness from some quarters.
Man United's expenditures were from money earned by the club, unlike Man City.
This City team is basically Guardiola playing real life Fm.
The why is your stadium empty every fecking week?
How much of it was luck and how much of it was brilliantly worked is debatable. But yes, their timing was spot on to cash in and build their brand./To an extent you're right, but Man United were also incredibly lucky than their period of success coincided with the explosion of the PL and football finance.
.
Me and all. Right now the way Arsenal are playing makes me feel like taking time off football for a year. Maybe meanwhile I would just watch City for entertainment. The guy knows his football and he doesn't keep it simple for his players. The way Delph moves infield and the centre backs spread out wide to receive the ball from the keeper, the constant interchanging of positions, the attempt to play total football takes some serious concentration and thorough preparation from the players and manager.Re: thread title, I’d happily sell the club’s ‘soul’ (if you can even call swapping Kroenke for a ME sugar daddy that) for a squad and play style like City’s.
Is that true?Man United's expenditures were from money earned by the club, unlike Man City.
This City team is basically Guardiola playing real life Fm.
Good job I am an atheist then.That's a question between you and your god. I'm just his messenger.
ahhhhh another lie, keep telling yourself that, it makes us smile, as that is all you seem to have left.The why is your stadium empty every fecking week?
1. The stadium is NOT free, we pay Manchester City Council a set amount every year for it. It used to be a percentage of the attendance above the capacity of Maine Road for the first 12 years or so, but was renegotiated a while back, to the satisfaction of BOTH parties.They have always underachieved, they were handed a free stadium and a winning lottery ticket and they are still managing to underachieve.
They should be winning the league regularly and challenging Barca, Real etc, everyone wetting themselves because a £600m team beats Stoke.
Exactly.Re: thread title, I’d happily sell the club’s ‘soul’ (if you can even call swapping Kroenke for a ME sugar daddy that) for a squad and play style like City’s.
2014, well, technically, Liverpool won it in April, but then Stevie Me slipped and we were awarded it.When did City win the league last time?
Spending over 100 millions every summer since then to get where they are now.
So if we stop ****ing around and start spending 100 millions every summer we may win the league after 4 years!