It's a service in the UK, I'll say no more, dm if interestedIs this a legal service in Britain though? Give me some context, where are you from.
It's a service in the UK, I'll say no more, dm if interestedIs this a legal service in Britain though? Give me some context, where are you from.
I don't have much confidence to be honest. He said:
“The main thing I saw in the game is that we let them get into situations where it was just a sprint. It was not about football or technical stuff, they just went in a competitive sprint with our player.
“We want to stop that, so that’s something we will focus on.”
So how do you stop a sprint? You put players in there who can sprint also. Yet the likelihood is we will see Xhaka and Guendouzi again.
In India, you pay something like 1000 Rupees a year which translates to 11 pound per year for a hotstar subscription. They stream ALL PL MATCHES. I can watch whichever match I care about. In UK, I have to get 3 subscriptions to cover most matches and I still will not be able to watch all the matches. Each of these subscriptions cost from 10 to 30 pounds per month. And then they complain about streaming and piracy.
I was thinking this too. How many other sports and countries operate like this. Not the same in our local Rugby that is for definite.One of the reasons it’s £££ to subscribe in the UK to all the televised games and the reason televised 3pm games on Saturday is verboten is the powers that be feel this will have an a negative impact on the crowds and atmosphere in the Premiership which will have a knock on impact on the perceived value of their product.
Thats not true.One of the reasons it’s £££ to subscribe in the UK to all the televised games and the reason televised 3pm games on Saturday is verboten is the powers that be feel this will have an a negative impact on the crowds and atmosphere in the Premiership which will have a knock on impact on the perceived value of their product.
What is the reason then?Thats not true.
In the 60s long before the premier league was considered and TV was coming into the game a league chairman put forward a new rule to ban 3pm kick offs being broadcast on TV. The thought being if Man Utd vs Liverpool was live on TV people would be less likely to go watch their local clubs thus impacting attendances and profitability of lower leagues clubs. The rule passed and has been in force ever since. A blanket UK ban is in place between 2.45pm and 5.15pm.What is the reason then?
Thanks, not from the UK so really isn't as obvious for me as it is for you. Very interesting though.In the 60s long before the premier league was considered and TV was coming into the game a league chairman put forward a new rule to ban 3pm kick offs being broadcast on TV. The thought being if Man Utd vs Liverpool was live on TV people would be less likely to go watch their local clubs thus impacting attendances and profitability of lower leagues clubs. The rule passed and has been in force ever since. A blanket UK ban is in place between 2.45pm and 5.15pm.
The rule was designed to protect lower smaller clubs. Nothing to do with the top flight or value of their product.
Really a quick google search of UK TV 3pm blackout is all that's needed.
Really a quick google search of UK TV 3pm blackout is all that's needed.
Brighton is our *****.Even in this dross of form,we'll ruin them.
I love Freddie showing Martinelli how it's done at 6:47.*not a clipboard in sight
*Tierney as always in short sleeves and shorts - he must be finding North London positively balmy after Glasgow
*nice to see Per out on a field again, and he looks to be enjoying himself
It's a service in the UK, I'll say no more, dm if interested
Brighton is our *****.Even in this dross of form,we'll ruin them.