Your Opinion about: Frank Lampard

[Arsenic_addicted]

I guess everybody had known about Arsène Wenger praised Frank Lampark for his performances for Chelsea saying that he has played a major role in Chelsea.

I think he's a good player too, but if he gets in the Arsenal squad, there's too many competitions like Vieira and Edu.

What do you guys think bout this lad? And another player:
Juan Pablo Angel.
I guess he's not gonna be a Gunner anymore since Jose Antonio Reyes was bought.

28 straight unbeaten run?! I can't even do that in a game... - Man U fan

I'm not a bit surprised...

 

[Soler]

He goes completely missing when playing against CM's of a higher quality than he is - like Vieira. Can unleash a cracking shot though.

 

[kNiteMare]

He can still improve i guess. But definitly not able to make 1st team in Arsenal... maybe an alright backup.

 

[Sammer]

Duff is a much more interesting prospect than Lampard imo. Duff would be a great signing.

 

[Iron Monkey]

Lampart is iron man, play every games so far for Chelsea

 

[Exiled In Newcastle]

No. Fat Franky is only good against lesser sides. He dissapears as soon as there's a real challenge on.

Typical Chelski player, but no way is he Arsenal material.

 

[Aussie]

Has been Chelski's best player in my opinion. Not saying much though i would have been there second best.

 

[Piston Broke]

Too attacking for my liking we need a holding midfielder

 

[god14]

frank lampard is a very good player but he could not get into arsenal 1st team. vieira gilberto edu and parlour all beat him in my view

 

[satan_beckham]

what the hell...lampard being beaten by parlour,edu,gilberto....k we as arsenal fans hate chelsea players but if u think like a neutral he will surely on top of all of them,can score,can create goals,he is the type of player we need to score from the centre of midfield,someone like scholes..always very dangerous from the midfield

 

[n_henry]

what the hell...lampard being beaten by parlour,edu,gilberto....k we as arsenal fans hate chelsea players but if u think like a neutral he will surely on top of all of them,can score,can create goals,he is the type of player we need to score from the centre of midfield,someone like scholes..always very dangerous from the midfield

I agree...I don't think Ray, Gilberto or Edu are all better than Lampard... though, the only one you can really compare him to there is Edu and maybe Ray...

IMHO, Lampard has been Chelski's best player this season...

Would I like him in Arsenal colours? I wouldn't mind... but I wouldn't swap him for Edu right now.

 

[Adam]

It is not about individuals in Arsenal teams. It's how they fit within the team's play and the greater objective.

 

[tox]

Lampard is a quality all round player, altho hes not really in the arsenal mould.

 

[pamilih]

Duff is a much more interesting prospect than Lampard imo. Duff would be a great signing.

I agree because when Pires retires, I honestly don't think Bentley wil take over...

 

[pamilih]

Lampard is a quality all round player, altho hes not really in the arsenal mould.

Too West-Hamish ... not our style ...

 

[Mark]

Doesn't show up in big games, as you saw against us. He started the season really well but has lately run out of steam a bit.

 

[tox]

he did play very well against Lazio away in the CL.

 

[It's Up For Grabs Now]

Definitely would take him. Diasgree that he disappears in big games - admitedly he was poor against us but he has quality

 

[Arjan]

Never rated him that high TBH, I think he is hyped becuase he is one of the few british players at a top level.

He has a good shot though, but i think that Marc Van Bommel is a better player then Frank Lampard!

 

[gunnertilldeath]

i think lampard is awesome. thats right, i said it. would love to see him at Arsenal. however impossible that seems at the moment. plays for a team we are not fond of at all but cant deny quality when i see it.