Kingslayer
Forza Milan
Imagine had we won the league that year, beating off the two CL finalists.
I suppose that's one way to weaken the opposition...
Imagine had we won the league that year, beating off the two CL finalists.
Does anyone else think it might be a good idea to let Wenger take the Director of Football roll and allow someone else take care of the match day preparations.
1. People probably still agree that having Wenger is still a pulling point for players
2. He studies the game constantly
3. He has contacts all over the world
4. He has a degree in economics
5. Certainly has the best interests of Arsenal at heart
6. Would be a good football man to put on the board.
That is literally everything you would want from a good director of football and it allows someone else who is more likely to keep the players on their toes and change up team tactics mid game to sit in the dug out.
I suppose that's one way to weaken the opposition...
He has a degree in economics, but created the worst pay structure in world football. Not only that, he continues to pursue this structure even though we are unable to sell anyone who isn't boarderline WC.Resounding no on my part.
I keep repeating myself but one of Arsène's biggest weaknesses is his faith in substandard/mediocre players who continue to let him down season after season. Yet despite moving these players on, he rewards them with fat contracts, on salaries far beyond the utility they provide on the pitch.
The current wage structure we have at the club is one of the biggest reasons we aren't competitive. We have the money, we use it appallingly.
Arsène as a DoF/Sporting director would see no change to the status quo in this regard.
He has a degree in economics, but created the worst pay structure in world football. Not only that, he continues to pursue this structure even though we are unable to sell anyone who isn't boarderline WC.
Can we make a poll on here of like the top 10 most connected managers with the arsenal job and see what the general opinion is on here?
Hmmm...no football without the support of the fans.
Debatable point I think.
Wenger's never looked or quacked like a spectacular failure by any sane measure of standards it's all been internet hype.When we look at Wenger through our current perspective, he looks like a spectacular failure to many. Opposition fans cheer at the sound of him staying at Arsenal. Arsenal fans feel embarrassed and pessimistic about the future.
That's at most, a perspective of five years or so.
Looking further and we start to see the truth. We are an actual giant of the game now, regularly appearing in the top 10 football club lists as far as financial size is concerned. Boasting one of the world's finest facilities, and in an amazing financial position, which is not dependent on our ownership.
With due respect to Arsène, I would describe our situation as a young kid taking his drivers test with a Lamborghini Diablo.
Does anyone else think it might be a good idea to let Wenger take the Director of Football roll and allow someone else take care of the match day preparations.
1. People probably still agree that having Wenger is still a pulling point for players
2. He studies the game constantly
3. He has contacts all over the world
4. He has a degree in economics
5. Certainly has the best interests of Arsenal at heart
6. Would be a good football man to put on the board.
That is literally everything you would want from a good director of football and it allows someone else who is more likely to keep the players on their toes and change up team tactics mid game to sit in the dug out.
...We disclose this ratio as a benchmark which is widely used in the analysis of football finance although our own monitoring in this area is based on total player spend, a combination of wages plus transfer expenditure and related costs, on a rolling three year basis against projections for the available funds generated over that period by the Group’s business activities.
I'll throw another name in the hat
Spalleti
we got somewhat of a working relationship with Roma
Roma are kinda the arsenal of Italy, both in playing style and flair of the club
Spalleti has a working relationship with Chez and Verms is there to
Roma plays pretty similar to us
and hey if he wants to bring
either of
Salah,
Florenzi
Emerson
Radja
I'd be happy
Yeah...but no.
Management comes down to winning. Wenger has done well in niche areas, arguably doing a job that no other manager could do but at the end of the day the guy who wins the races gets the plaudits not the guy who didn't win but admirably came second despite having one leg.
Not necessarily fair but it be's that way sometimes.
I found an interesting excerpt from the 15/16 Annual FS RE: Wages and wages as a % of revenues.
I wonder how common TPS is used in the football community rather than just wages. I'm assuming it's widely used.
Well yeah the way it's accounted is amortisation. So in the accounts the way a player yearly cost is accounted is (annual salary + transfer fee)/length of contract. So the yearly cost of all those values for all the players versus how much we have the spend on those things makes more sense than just using wages. It's ok not part of he equation in accounting terms.
Overall we have a pot for transfers and wages each year.
Can we add in Emery, Potchettino and Favre as well?
Now this is more like it. Sadly Emery has just begun his adventure at PSG, Pochy manages Sp**s and Favre still has a few question marks over him.
I'd love potch here. Good manager, would also send the spuds into meltdown.