fabo
6.51 / 10
His performance went to **** against Sunderland after a spell in the first half so I'm not really buying Ox's 'good' form.
Seems to have a weak mentality.
Seems to have a weak mentality.
Barely posted here this season but I didn't think he was resurgent at all. Running past a Blunderland full back getting a cross in or against Bulgarian parttimers doesn't constitute a "resurgence".Knee-jerk thread title change off the back of a bad cameo in a NLD... He was almost resurgent last week... Whether you think he's great or a pile of sh!t, this is just silly.
Sort it out ffs!
Yeah I noticed that too, even his good games were littered with wtf moments. The match threads will back this up.He hasn't even been playing that well in his cameos so far this season.
Yeah he scored and seems to be a bit more productive. But most on here were hoping that it would put more confidence into his head and his general play, which by the way has been **** so far this season, would improve.
Yeah I noticed that too, even his good games were littered with wtf moments. The match threads will back this up.
Problem is if you say this after one of these good games you're a hater. If you say it now you're a hater crawling out of the woodwork. Can't win.
His performance upon entering the field brought our collective performance down a notch. Something he shouldn't even be able to do. That's how bad he was when he came on. Ramsey was just as bad IMO so I don't think it's just Ox, but even in the games where he was supposedly good, they were "encouraging" performances at best that were punctuated by end product. .It's understandable to pick on Ox because he has not shown anything consistently good in his last few years, but why do it after a short sub performance? Difficult game, we looked out of ideas as a team, regardless of Ox.
His performance upon entering the field brought our collective performance down a notch. Something he shouldn't even be able to do. That's how bad he was when he came on. Ramsey was just as bad IMO so I don't think it's just Ox, but even in the games where he was supposedly good, they were "encouraging" performances at best that were punctuated by end product. .
It was the worst group sub performance I've ever seen.Giroud , Ramsey and Ox gave zero drive .
It's understandable to pick on Ox because he has not shown anything consistently good in his last few years, but why do it after a short sub performance? Difficult game, we looked out of ideas as a team, regardless of Ox.
His performance upon entering the field brought our collective performance down a notch. Something he shouldn't even be able to do. That's how bad he was when he came on. Ramsey was just as bad IMO so I don't think it's just Ox, but even in the games where he was supposedly good, they were "encouraging" performances at best that were punctuated by end product. .
It's understandable to pick on Ox because he has not shown anything consistently good in his last few years, but why do it after a short sub performance? Difficult game, we looked out of ideas as a team, regardless of Ox.
It was the worst group sub performance I've ever seen.
Everyone seems to be very critical of Ramsey but I swear the team perked up in the 5mins between Ramsey coming on and Giroud and Ox coming on? When the latter two came on it was equivalent to Sp**s bringing on an extra defender, never seen anything like it.
Ox is a dribbling midfielder trying to play like a midfield general . Attack the ****ing box ffs, Ramsey when we don't have the ball might as well be as slow as Giroud for all he does and Giroud looked like he was trying to conserve energy , just mental .
We should have sold Ox and bought Mahrez, I said it in the summer.