JoaoFelix
Active Member
I tried to talk to you but you’re a *****. Bye bye.
I get y'all point of view but at the end of the day we still lost.
I tried to talk to you but you’re a *****. Bye bye.
I’ve witnessed some real drubbings (8-2, 6-0 etc. and I’m still here. I’ll not be f****** off anywhere, thanks.We could have been up by two if Auba and Peps score good chances. They score two silly goals from our point of view and the game is done. At 3-0, we could have subsided. We didn't and showed character which shows this team has personality. We need our full backs back and Holding back will help too. If you can't sit tight and see we're heading the right way, you should **** off now, tbh.
It's funny how people bring up Wenger, when he was a victim of the same criticism. His game plan at the Nou Camp in 2011 was perfect and the team was going through until RVP's red card. Yet afterwards people mocked the team for not having any shots on target. (And no, I'm not comparing this Liverpool team to that Barca team before anyone tries it.)That’s not how football works though? A gameplan doesn’t become wrong just because you don’t get the result you wanted.
That's all right. I never read your posts.I’ve witnessed some real drubbings (8-2, 6-0 etc. and I’m still here. I’ll not be f****** off anywhere, thanks.
We tried to defend and we lost.
If KT and Bellerin had played i think we would have got something.
Fair enough. Even nicked a goal late. But how does anyone justify the manager waiting until the 82nd minute to make an attacking substitution? Showing character doesn't just apply to those out on the pitch. We were immediately more dangerous with Lacazette out there. If he makes that sub 65 minutes in instead of 82 minutes in, maybe we have something to show for the character. All of the excuses in the world do not absolve Emery of a series of decisions ranging from questionable to poor today.We could have been up by two if Auba and Peps score good chances. They score two silly goals from our point of view and the game is done. At 3-0, we could have subsided. We didn't and showed character which shows this team has personality. We need our full backs back and Holding back will help too. If you can't sit tight and see we're heading the right way, you should **** off now, tbh.
It didn't work.....so the loss would've been easier to handle had we tried to attack?
Liverpool needed a set piece to break us down as they couldn't produce anything from open play.
But yeah, why not attack them at Anfield and play into their hands, instead of denying them their quick transition play and utilitize our quick forwards instead.
Going 442 was to limit salah firmino mane to play and it worked until salah brilliance. We kept mane Firmino quiet all gameWhen you play a narrow diamond in midfield then obviously the fullbacks matter a lot. That's where I don't readily understand the decision to go 4-4-2 instead of sticking with 4-3-3.
I think he wanted an extra man in midfield and hope the fullbacks would make up the width.When you play a narrow diamond in midfield then obviously the fullbacks matter a lot. That's where I don't readily understand the decision to go 4-4-2 instead of sticking with 4-3-3.
From the safety of his computer:Genuinely would like to slap some of you.
How can you say it worked when they shot 13 times.Going 442 was to limit salah firmino mane to play and it worked until salah brilliance. We kept mane Firmino quiet all game
Even Pep changed the way they played there massively last season after they conceded 4 and 3 on his previous two visits. Fullbacks didn’t push on at all and they kept numbers behind the ball in midfield. Played a very cagey game. Can’t think of any other team / stadium he’s changed his philosophy for.If we ended up attacking Liverpool one bad pass and the space will be all for Liverpool to attack its bad idea all teams who go there and want result have to sit deep and counter unless you are man city
How can you say it worked when they shot 13 times.