- Thread starter
- #6,521
Can they give us 35m for Hector first before spending 70m on koulibaly
Is it true that Chelsea sold Hazard for 160m Euros?
How???
Typical for RM and Barca when they set their eyes on a player. Coutinho, for example.
Why can't they set their eyes on an Arsenal player? Barcelona used cheap classless tactics to bring the Fabregas fee down and we gave in to it, selling him for what was relatively peanuts compared to his worth.
Why can't they set their eyes on an Arsenal player? Barcelona used cheap classless tactics to bring the Fabregas fee down and we gave in to it, selling him for what was relatively peanuts compared to his worth.
Yeah its frustrating when you put it that way. They got Fabregas for 28m which was cheap even back then, while buying a decent player in Coutinho for maybe the top 3 transfer fees of all time...Why can't they set their eyes on an Arsenal player? Barcelona used cheap classless tactics to bring the Fabregas fee down and we gave in to it, selling him for what was relatively peanuts compared to his worth.
Angelino is staying at Leipzig. Loan + option to buy.
I think Cesc himself contributed to that when he, more or less, forced himself out. Yes, it was understandable that he wanted to join Barcelona and was fed up with not winning titles but that doesnt excuse his behaviour. Im happy that he never really became a success story in Spain.
Can they give us 35m for Hector first before spending 70m on koulibaly
Agree his form declined last season i still think they getting 70m for himNapoli should have sold him 1-2 seasons ago. Think they'll struggle to get 75m Euros for Koulibaly, even from PSG.
He Arsenal fan that's why he rejected Sp**s
No one is paying £70m for a 29 year old CB. Especially in this market.Agree his form declined last season i still think they getting 70m for him