we won.. what more needs to be said.. we dominated play, passed it around nice, scored 2 goals and got 3 points in Europe and are tops in the group (for now)... after our EPL matches lately, this is more than we got out of them.. and we were without Henry, Toure (for most of the match), Freddie, etc...patrick42uk said:Mbaki Mutahaba said:patrick42uk said:so i'm not the only one who got that feeling.
anyway, yes its 3 points but IMO it was a worrying performance. great strike from rosicky but i think its worrying that we depended on that to be the winner. defensively we lost concentration (again) in the first and second half. offensively, we dont even look a force. we still havent scored a proper goal post zagreb which makes you wonder what exactly we are doing in training. this game was set up perfectly to justify why we play the way we do. we are supposed to be an ofensive passing team yet we depend on a low% 25 yarder to win a game? plan a is failing us spectacularly.
What exactly where you expecting in this game? We got a goal early, they went down to 10 men. We controlled the tempo of the game..adn didn't look like we wanted to burn too much energy adn rigthly so. We do have a game on Sunday. These guys chased and chased.come second half they were tired bar the last 5 minutes. Are you suggesting we should only be scoring those 2 yard tapins?
does it not concern you that our passing gam isnt being prodcutive against a ten man team who actually came out and attacked us? so what hope is there of it being productive against negative teams like boro and villa. i hate the way people bury their heads in the sand and only want to recognise problems when we lose.
patrick42uk said:does it not concern you that our passing gam isnt being prodcutive against a ten man team who actually came out and attacked us? so what hope is there of it being productive against negative teams like boro and villa. i hate the way people bury their heads in the sand and only want to recognise problems when we lose.
Mbaki Mutahaba said:patrick42uk said:does it not concern you that our passing gam isnt being prodcutive against a ten man team who actually came out and attacked us? so what hope is there of it being productive against negative teams like boro and villa. i hate the way people bury their heads in the sand and only want to recognise problems when we lose.
They came at us from the get go and we punished them early with the counter attack that resulted to a goal and a keeper sent off. What else would you want? There really was no point of commitimg more numbers upfront searching for a second goal.
Productivity of the passing game does not necessarily equate to a lot of goals. I think our passing game was very good today(63% possession), just as it was good against Boro, Villa or City. We just did not take our chances during those games. We had more opportunities to score in that game than today.
At the same time you can not expect the same mentality playing CL football as EPL. Why do we have such short memories? That is what used to kill us back then in the CL when we were smoking all the EPL teams.
BTW am not claiming we don't have any problems cos we won..they are there..but its work in progress. Step by step.
patrick42uk said:Mbaki Mutahaba said:patrick42uk said:so i'm not the only one who got that feeling.
anyway, yes its 3 points but IMO it was a worrying performance. great strike from rosicky but i think its worrying that we depended on that to be the winner. defensively we lost concentration (again) in the first and second half. offensively, we dont even look a force. we still havent scored a proper goal post zagreb which makes you wonder what exactly we are doing in training. this game was set up perfectly to justify why we play the way we do. we are supposed to be an ofensive passing team yet we depend on a low% 25 yarder to win a game? plan a is failing us spectacularly.
What exactly where you expecting in this game? We got a goal early, they went down to 10 men. We controlled the tempo of the game..adn didn't look like we wanted to burn too much energy adn rigthly so. We do have a game on Sunday. These guys chased and chased.come second half they were tired bar the last 5 minutes. Are you suggesting we should only be scoring those 2 yard tapins?
does it not concern you that our passing gam isnt being prodcutive against a ten man team who actually came out and attacked us? so what hope is there of it being productive against negative teams like boro and villa. i hate the way people bury their heads in the sand and only want to recognise problems when we lose.
patrick42uk said:no point commiting players forward to get the second? i think the goal they scored at the end suggests there was.
i guess it depends what your definition of 'opportunities' is. for instance against boro i recall one opportunity, hlebs chance which was saved. the rest were hopeful punts and not clear cut chances. remember that wenger said the passing game is supposed to be efficient in that we should create high perentage chances. this is clearly not happening. city away in teh first half is the only case were the not taking chances argument is justified.
there cannot be any other way to judge the productivity of our passing game but goals, particularly as we claim to be an offensive team. if we were like the valencia of old who played for 1-0 where possession was part of their defensive tactics then fair enough.
for me there is no distinction between cl style and prem style where arsenal is concerend. we play teh same way in both compeitions and at this moment in time, that system has some glaring weaknesses.
MUTERI said:Now, 3 European games, 3 wins, 2 of them are away, showing some good signs like killing off the opponents (3-0 at Zagreb) and coming from behind (2-1 in the 2nd leg).
while after 3 PL matches, 2 of them are at home, against much weaker sides , no wins, no comings from behind to win, and yet to score first let a lone killing the game.
well, this season could be a copy of the last one.