Dennis_Bergkamp_10
Established Member
There might be something special to him, but is it worth it to play both Auba and Saka out of position for him?
My answer is no.
My answer is no.
OK, let's be honest a bit here. Auba is not an alien and he has the ability to screw more chances than the average 17y old, although with his other abilities he will probably end up with more chances with his movement. His conversion is not perfect for sure and Auba needs service just like Laca and Eddie, the service none of them would receive on that day.Aubameyang's goalscoring record speaks for itself. Saka should be on the left but played on the right so Auba could play on the left win so we could fit Eddie at centre-forward. If this was the single most important consideration in determining the forward line then one would expect more from him. Messi might not be great if you played him at centre back.
I agree with your point on the midfield, I don't agree on your views on Auba. Players don't just score 49 premiership goals in a couple of seasons playing for a pedestrian team. Whatever his conversion rate it's the goals scored that count because surely he is being supplied by the same midfield?OK, let's be honest a bit here. Auba is not an alien and he has the ability to screw more chances than the average 17y old, although with his other abilities he will probably end up with more chances with his movement. His conversion is not perfect for sure and Auba needs service just like Laca and Eddie, the service none of them would receive on that day.
None of them is Henry who will take the ball 50 yards out and score.
Let's not pretend anything would be different with Auba playing CF and Eddie on the bench.
This post has absolutely nothing against Auba-Laca-Eddie, my point is that without a strong midfield, all of them will struggle
Agree. The Saka on the right experiment has shown that the idea didn't work.Eddie is quite a good player & certainly think he has good potential to be starting over Lacazette but not at the expense of playing Saka out of position. That was a pretty bad mistake by Arteta to play Saka on the right against a team like City. If he wants to fit Saka in up front somewhere then take Eddie out, play Auba in the middle & Pepe on the right. Otherwise if he wants to keep Eddie in then keep Auba on the left & have Saka come in as a super sub. Take Eddie out, shift Auba to the middle & Saka come in on the left.
Auba Eddie Pepe/Nelson (Saka sub)
Saka Auba Pepe/Nelson
There might be something special to him, but is it worth it to play both Auba and Saka out of position for him?
My answer is no.
Fair enough if he was trying an experiment but if that was just an experiment then I hope he realises that it didn't work & doesn't do it again especially not straight away against Brighton, they are a decent team actually & already beaten us this year at home so we cannot underestimate them at all & go with a strong lineup with more experience. Eddie did look very strong when we started off well in the first bit but then everyone just collapsed.Agree. The Saka on the right experiment has shown that the idea didn't work.
I get what Arteta was trying to do though. The first 25 minutes or so should be the benchmark of what we saw against City. Willock and Nketiah were disrupting their build-up play, they had trouble getting into their rhythm (when they found it we were ****ed obviously). It did lead to two or three opportunities to punish them on the break, but we missed the opportunities. I thought Nketiah was a handful for Garcia and Laporte, Garcia should've gotten an early yellow for holding and I think he torpedoed Laporte off the ball once. With no build-up play or through-ball potential in midfield our attack was isolated the entire time, though and ultimately incredibly ineffective. We lost the game in midfield, which immediately was my biggest worry when I saw the line-up.
It's not even the same midfield anymore. I didn't think I would say this, but I would take Iwobi - Özil - Mkhi -Ramsey midfield over this **** show that we have these days. This has to be the worst midfield for the last 30 years that we've played on Wednesday, and both Auba and Eddie struggledI agree with your point on the midfield, I don't agree on your views on Auba. Players don't just score 49 premiership goals in a couple of seasons playing for a pedestrian team. Whatever his conversion rate it's the goals scored that count because surely he is being supplied by the same midfield?
The same thing goes for Saka, how can you tell it has failed? You just can't know it until you get a proper midfield and defense. Not saying it was a success, but we need some control of the game to see if our attacking formations works or not. Saka, Eddie and Auba played in their own half, barely touching the ball. Midfield was a complete failure, that's for sure.Agree. The Saka on the right experiment has shown that the idea didn't work.
Fair enough, you could try the experiment again with different conditions (better midfield players), but with the current squad it didn't seem to work as a strategy against a dominant team. Not saying it is Saka's fault.The same thing goes for Saka, how can you tell it has failed? You just can't know it until you get a proper midfield and defense. Not saying it was a success, but we need some control of the game to see if our attacking formations works or not. Saka, Eddie and Auba played in their own half, barely touching the ball. Midfield was a complete failure, that's for sure.
No, it didn't look right at all. Even a more dominant player like Pepe would struggle. I would like to see something like that again, or Saka left and Pepe right. Think both of them can create chances, but Arteta needs to rethink his midfield approach asap.Fair enough, you could try the experiment again with different conditions (better midfield players), but with the current squad it didn't seem to work as a strategy against a dominant team. Not saying it is Saka's fault.
I don't agree - we aren't in a position as a Club where we can gamble on mediocre talents like Nketiah. He just doesn't have the ability to be world class, it's obvious after several performances. He doesn't have the strength, touch or vision that's needed and he doesn't run as much as a Suarez-type aggressive striker.It's too early to judge Nketiah. Eddie's at the point where he needs next season to be given about 1000 minutes or so to show what he can do. At the end of next season you can then decide if he's good enough or if you sell him to reinvest elsewhere.
I don't agree - we aren't in a position as a Club where we can gamble on mediocre talents like Nketiah. He just doesn't have the ability to be world class, it's obvious after several performances. He doesn't have the strength, touch or vision that's needed and he doesn't run as much as a Suarez-type aggressive striker.
Maybe he is going to be a good player 5 years later, maybe not - I really hope he will be as he is such a nice guy -, but at the 9th place losing to Brightons, we cannot be relying on strikers like him to make the difference.
There might be something special to him, but is it worth it to play both Auba and Saka out of position for him?
My answer is no.
I don't argue with that, I formed my opinion on Nketiah based on his general game and characteristics. He is not the biggest, nor the strongest, nor the fastest around. You can make up with great vision, passing, control, finishing, positioning.I get that, but you don't make big decisions on young players like Nketiah based on a game like Brighton today.