• ! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !

    Discussions about police investigations

    In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.

    Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.

Is The Premier League Tougher Than It Used To Be?

Is It?


  • Total voters
    150

Bagels

Well-Known Member
Trusted ⭐

Country: Canada
The clubs earn a lot more money also, so paying more is natural.

No one has ever here argued how the level of players doesn't go up, if the number of players practicing football in the world goes up.

It's weird. I only see claims that it isn't true, but no reasoning at all.

Let's say if the number of players who practice football in the world has doubled in 20 years. For example 1 million vs. 2 million.

You guys are saying that there won't be more top players available? Or that the competition to rise to the top isn’t harder? Which means you have to be better than before.
It is a point that seems paradoxical, and I’m curious the different ways people might address it/their thoughts on it. This idea that despite the overall talent pool growing, the talent level is decreasing.
 

Country: USA
Do people think players today are more athletic than 15-20 years ago? I would think the answer is almost surely yes even if you have outliers. Likewise I think players probably have improved their technique too because of better training sessions and the sharing of best practices/tactics. And that's without getting into the intense competition and youth development now in many parts of the world. We know this was true when we take the comparisons to the extreme. For instance, no one thinks Di Stefano's Real Madrid team could compete with the current Real Madrid squad. So what explains a reverse trend between 1995 and 2024?

Someone has a breakthrough, they enjoy an advantage, then other people notice and copy. That's how growth happens generally. It's true that the story gets complicated in some spaces like music, art, or architecture where you could say things have declined, and I confess to not knowing the exact answer, but the general trendline of improvement seems inarguable to me. Maybe football is like music or art in that we've gone backwards for some strange reason, but I think it is safe to say that if the aliens came to play us, we'd have a better chance with the best XI players in 2024 than the best XI players in 1995 (adjusting for everyone's age of course!).

With all that in mind, I think the quality of the players has gone up. Some people respond by saying, well we have no great strikers today compared to the 1990s or 2000s, and I agree that certain player roles have changed etc, but one possible point is that it's harder to be a superstar when the level of competition has gone up. In other words, if defenders got much better and defensive tactics became savvier, then it's unsurprising today's strikers look relatively worse even if they were better in an absolute sense.

Obviously all of this is nonfalsifiable and that's why it's a fun debate, but this seems very intuitive to me!
 

2Smokeyy

5.0 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ (49)
Trusted ⭐

Country: England
Talent wise, can someone name me a position across the pitch that this era is superior to than in any year within the 00s?

This era is flooded with system players whereby the managers are the stars of the show.
 

Batman

Head of the Wayne foundation for benching Nketiah

Country: USA

Player:Saliba
Talent wise, can someone name me a position across the pitch that this era is superior to than in any year within the 00s?

This era is flooded with system players whereby the managers are the stars of the show.
This. On average these players might be better athletes but their skill level is considerably lower and most of the self expression has been coached out of the game. Hazard and Özil might have been the last guys with technical quality you could compare (and even then it wasn't close) to the Bergkamp/Henry/Cantona sorts.
 

Makingtrax

Worships in the house of Wenger 🙏
Trusted ⭐

Country: England

Player:Saliba
This. On average these players might be better athletes but their skill level is considerably lower and most of the self expression has been coached out of the game. Hazard and Özil might have been the last guys with technical quality you could compare (and even then it wasn't close) to the Bergkamp/Henry/Cantona sorts.
Exactly. Freedom of expression is coached out of modern players, so you’re not going to get those jaw dropping moments of self confidence and outrageous skill of the entertainer that used to take your breath away.
 

GoonerJeeves

Established Member
Trusted ⭐

Country: Norway
I think on the whole, this is a discussion that is more or less impossible to land. How do you really verify a statement that the Premier League tougher or not?

In the end you just end up with a loose confederation of warring tribes in this thread.
 

Oxeki

Match Day Thread Merchant
Trusted ⭐

Country: Nigeria

Player:Saliba
Kloop's Liverpool is one of the best team of the last 10 years. Yet their midfield lynchpins were cloggers. The reason why those teams performed above their contemporaries was due to their physical advantage and them having a world class manager who could get blood from a stone.

Like @2Smokeyy said, the manager is the star of the show these days. The only team in the world that gives me peak 2000s vibe is Madrid tbh.

Look at Sp**s with Modric, Van see Vert, Bale, Walker, Rose etc.

That team had genuine world class players.

The few world class players nowadays are all concentrated in handful of rich teams. It means that no matter the money teams like west Ham, aston villa and the likes have, they'll never attract the absolute top players cos those players would want to play for madrid, Arsenal, city, Liverpool, etc. That's just how it is. The midtable teams may have more money, but teams like Liverpool, City, United, Chelsea are pulling away from them revenue-wise. These midtable teams could go to other leagues and bully the likes of Sampdoria or Atalanta but within the PL, they're falling further and further behind the top six clubs.
 
Last edited:

Oxeki

Match Day Thread Merchant
Trusted ⭐

Country: Nigeria

Player:Saliba
Also around 2005-2009 the top 4 sides in England were the best team in Europe.

United's greatest ever side (the 07-08)
one that probably had more world class players than this City side, weren't as dominant as this City side cos you had other top teams in England. Even the midtable teams around that time like Villa and Everton were very good. Team flirting with relegations like Sunderland and Stoke was extremely hard to be. Going away and winning in those stadium was like a test of your title credentials not ****e like Burnley and Sheffield we have now.
 

MaraDon

Wants you to learn about football
Kevin de Bruyne played a total of 20 games this season.
So far he has 6 goals and 16 assists.


Moh Salah so far started 31 games, he has a total of 24 goals and 13 assists.


The reason I´m posting this is because I feel that we sometimes forget how much of an impact an elite player has on a team.

I´ll put Kane in the same category and that is why the fatty at Sp**s deserves some credit, he was able to cope quite decently with his departure.

People saying Haaland has a so-so-season, he has 32 goals in 38 games.

To me, that is what we are missing, that X factor, that 30+ goals-assist player. I think Saka can get there, but he still needs to develop and I hate to say it but it's been a long time since we have had someone like that, one can argue since Alexis.

I want to have that player on my team. I miss that.
 

Maybe

You're wrong, no?
Kevin de Bruyne played a total of 20 games this season.
So far he has 6 goals and 16 assists.


Moh Salah so far started 31 games, he has a total of 24 goals and 13 assists.


The reason I´m posting this is because I feel that we sometimes forget how much of an impact an elite player has on a team.

I´ll put Kane in the same category and that is why the fatty at Sp**s deserves some credit, he was able to cope quite decently with his departure.

People saying Haaland has a so-so-season, he has 32 goals in 38 games.

To me, that is what we are missing, that X factor, that 30+ goals-assist player. I think Saka can get there, but he still needs to develop and I hate to say it but it's been a long time since we have had someone like that, one can argue since Alexis.

I want to have that player on my team. I miss that.
This thread is about some 80 fans trying to explain to @GDeep™ that the league might be stronger than it was 20 years ago. So far with no results I'm afraid
 
  • Funny
Reactions: A_G

LookingForEric

Patronize me again and I'll destroy you 😖

Country: Northern Ireland
The league is harder to win because of City. But the overall quality of the league is pretty crap in my opinion. United are awful, Chelsea are awful, Liverpool were completely over performing this year.

The thing with City is they’ve got into this mindset where they’ll win and stay calm no matter what, no matter how many games are left they can put themselves in a place to go unbeaten.
 

Maybe

You're wrong, no?
I always take Europe as a guide to how good the league is. If we compare it to 20 years ago, do English clubs do better or worse in Europe? The rest are just flawed opinions and some good old nostalgia
 

Dennis_Bergkamp_10

Established Member
The league is harder to win because of City. But the overall quality of the league is pretty crap in my opinion. United are awful, Chelsea are awful, Liverpool were completely over performing this year.

The thing with City is they’ve got into this mindset where they’ll win and stay calm no matter what, no matter how many games are left they can put themselves in a place to go unbeaten.

This exactly. City now has been on a 19 game unbeaten run, losing vs. Villa on the 6th of December. Meanwhile, they've played Champions League games, Club World Cup games, and cup games in between.

You have to be perfect to win the league, like Liverpool did in '19/20 when they've won the league by March.
 

Sanchez11

Nobody Is Coming!

Country: England
The bottom 10-12 teams in the prem are not good enough imo. But due to the money been bigger, the gap between the prem and champoinship is getting bigger. People moan about Forest and their squad. They didnt expect to get promoted and had a small squad, so spent as much as they could to survive. Fair play imo. The gap is too big and is making the league overall sh1te.
 

GDeep™

League is very weak
I always take Europe as a guide to how good the league is. If we compare it to 20 years ago, do English clubs do better or worse in Europe? The rest are just flawed opinions and some good old nostalgia
English clubs were doing better in the mid 2000’s when Europe was at its peak - strong Spain, Italy etc. You had Liverpool, Utd, Chelsea win the European cup at this time. These clubs also reached multiple CL finals at the time.
 

GDeep™

League is very weak
The league is poor, however you look at it. Quality of matches, star quality etc. You have the poorest Utd side ever who get battered every week but they are in contention for top 6.

This is also the worst Arsenal side I have seen. No stars, boring football etc.
 

Arsenal Quotes

I think I lost my hair flicking the ball on for all them years at the near post from Brian Marwood's corners

Steve Bould

Latest posts

Top Bottom