• ! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !

    Discussions about police investigations

    In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.

    Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.

Reserve League and the next generation

clockwork orange

Blind faith in "LVG filoshophy"
What the youngest age group, we have a team for? Do we have U7's or something like that? How many youth teams do we have for all age groups?
 

entropy13

Established Member
I think the youngest team we have are u12s, for those 9-12 years old, since 9 is the youngest age one can be "accepted" by an academy.
 

clockwork orange

Blind faith in "LVG filoshophy"
entropy13 said:
I think the youngest team we have are u12s, for those 9-12 years old, since 9 is the youngest age one can be "accepted" by an academy.
Thanks for the info. Think we should start with far younger players (All Dutch clubs start with 6 year olds) & have several teams for each age-group.

Most Dutch pro-clubs have 2 teams for each age-group (U18, U16, U14, U12, U10 & U8) at their Academy. So basically 30-40 players times 6 = 200-odd players. Apart from that most clubs have amateur sections, in which they have even more teams for each age-group.

My main reason for asking is that we seem to be top-notch at improving talents, but we hardly create them ourselves.

If for whatever administrative reason rule, we can only start as off age 9, which is 3 years too late, we should have an amateur team or more with lots of well trained youth teams.
 

Lukazan

Established Member
Took me an age to find this thread.

Anyway just a quick question.. I was gonna make a new thread but decided it wasn't worth it.

About 3 years ago (maybe a little more or less) I remember we took a Japanese/Chinese/Korean kid on trial/loan which may have become permanent. I remember there was quite alot of excitement over this kid as he was supposed to be a very highly rated youngster. I seem to remember him being compared to Henry due to his running at pace with the ball and his finishing. There was also a video clip of him doing an interview and a clip or two of him training at Arsenal, I think..

Anyone know what happened to this kid? Is he still here? Or did I imagine that we signed him up permanently?
 

Gurgen

Established Member
Wasn't he called Ito Sho or something like that? I have no idea what happened to him.

Edit: yeah, think that's the one <a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sho_Ito" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sho_Ito</a>

wiki said:
In August 2006, Ito received a trial from English club Arsenal, where he impressed manager Arsène Wenger. However, his work permit application fell through, and in January 2007, he signed a three-and-a-half-year contract with Grenoble, a club owned by Index Corp, a Japanese mobile content provider.
 

Muharraqawi

Active Member
Another question, what happened to that Brazilian guy Lenny?

Weren't we supposed to sign him on a Bosman?

I searched his name on Wikipedia and in the past they were saying that he was going to sign for us but they removed that now.

<a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenny_Fernandes_Coelho" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenny_Fernandes_Coelho</a>
 

Lukazan

Established Member
Gurgen said:
Wasn't he called Ito Sho or something like that? I have no idea what happened to him.

Edit: yeah, think that's the one <a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sho_Ito" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sho_Ito</a>

wiki said:
In August 2006, Ito received a trial from English club Arsenal, where he impressed manager Arsène Wenger. However, his work permit application fell through, and in January 2007, he signed a three-and-a-half-year contract with Grenoble, a club owned by Index Corp, a Japanese mobile content provider.

Ah, thanks for finding that out for me Gurg.

Bit of a shame really.
 

Anzac

Established Member
clockwork orange said:
entropy13 said:
I think the youngest team we have are u12s, for those 9-12 years old, since 9 is the youngest age one can be "accepted" by an academy.
Thanks for the info. Think we should start with far younger players (All Dutch clubs start with 6 year olds) & have several teams for each age-group.

Most Dutch pro-clubs have 2 teams for each age-group (U18, U16, U14, U12, U10 & U8) at their Academy. So basically 30-40 players times 6 = 200-odd players. Apart from that most clubs have amateur sections, in which they have even more teams for each age-group.

My main reason for asking is that we seem to be top-notch at improving talents, but we hardly create them ourselves.

If for whatever administrative reason rule, we can only start as off age 9, which is 3 years too late, we should have an amateur team or more with lots of well trained youth teams.

Don't the Sth Americans start younger as well?
 

Arsenal Quotes

As a club, we have an educational purpose: to give back to those people who love Arsenal so that they learn moral values from our game and how we behave.

Arsène Wenger

Latest posts

Top Bottom