• ! ! ! IMPORTANT MESSAGE ! ! !

    Discussions about police investigations

    In light of recent developments about a player from Premier League being arrested and until there is an official announcement, ALL users should refrain from discussing or speculating about situations around personal off-pitch matters related to any Arsenal player. This is to protect you and the forum.

    Users who disregard this reminder will be issued warnings and their posts will get deleted from public.

Squad Analysis 2022/23

Macho

Documenting your downfall 🎥
Dusted 🔻

Country: England
squad-photo-2022-23.png



Every summer, across the length and breadth of the land, Premier League recruitment chiefs find themselves tasked with signing new players in an increasingly challenging market.

Demanding players, wily agents and the impossible expectation of supporters make it an unenviable task. And those shopping overseas must also make sure they comply with Premier League laws, too.

These rules — initially introduced into English football in 2015 by then-FA chairman Greg Dyke — dictate clubs must include a certain number of homegrown players in their 25-man Premier League squad.

While intended to boost the talent pool for the national team, it has had several unexpected consequences, such as a select group of third-choice goalkeepers whose signings might be better understood as logistical rather than footballing decisions.

So, what do the rules say? Which clubs are flirting with the quota’s upper limit — and how might it impact their transfer activity?

The Athletic explains.


What are the Premier League rules?

For starters, clubs are allowed a maximum number of 25 players in their Premier League squad.

This can be supplemented by an unlimited number of under-21s — it does not matter if they are a regular part of the club’s senior squad, or what their nationality is.

For example, Arsenal’s Gabriel Martinelli still counts as an Under-21 player in 2022-23 — and will not count against Arsenal’s homegrown player quota.

That is despite him making 57 Premier League appearances for the club, scoring 11 goals.

Next season, players must be born after January 1 2001 to qualify as an Under-21.

Under current rules, no more than 17 players in a Premier League squad can be non-homegrown. Those players can be of any nationality or age.

The remaining members of the first-team squad must be homegrown.

Martinelli counts as a homegrown player (Photo: Getty Images)


Martinelli counts as a homegrown player (Photo: Getty Images)

What is a homegrown player?

It has a relatively simple definition.

For a player to be considered homegrown, they must have played for an FA-affiliated club for at least three years before turning 21. Importantly, they do not have to be English — players such as Paul Pogba and Hector Bellerin would all count as homegrown.

William Saliba is another interesting example. The France international, born in Paris, counts as a homegrown player because he has been on Arsenal’s books and listed in their Premier League squad for three seasons before his 21st birthday.

Conversely, a player’s nationality does not necessarily ensure they are homegrown. For example, Saint-Etienne goalkeeper Etienne Green, who plays in goal for England Under-21, would not be classified as such if he was to join a Premier League club this summer.

Etienne Green does not count as homegrown — despite playing for England (Photo: Getty Images)


Etienne Green does not count as homegrown — despite playing for England (Photo: Getty Images)

What if a team does not have enough homegrown players?

The rule is measured by the number of non-homegrown players, rather than the converse.

In practice, this means a club which does not have eight or more homegrown players is obliged to name a squad smaller than 25.

For example, Liverpool, who only had seven homegrown players last season, named a 24-man Premier League squad.

How has Brexit complicated matters?

More complicated than the Northern Ireland Protocol? Perhaps not.

But Premier League clubs have been affected by Brexit, with English clubs no longer afforded access to free movement of labour within the single market.

Without delving too deeply into the intricacies, this means sides can no longer sign players from the European Union under the age of 18.

With players needing to feature for an FA-affiliated club for at least three years before turning 21, this excludes many foreign players from homegrown status.

However, it is technically possible for a player signed at 18 to qualify, if they are born in the first six months of the year, and join in the summer immediately following their 18th birthday. This will apply to Saliba in upcoming seasons.

Arsenal’s William Saliba (Photo: Getty Images)


Arsenal’s William Saliba (Photo: Getty Images)

How have clubs dealt with it in the past?

Well, often by ensuring that players who are needed in the squad, but might not play much, are homegrown players.

One role which fits this description are back-up goalkeepers.

For example, The Athletic understands that Tottenham’s decision to not make Pierluigi Gollini’s loan permanent, instead replacing him with Fraser Forster, was impacted by homegrown player rules.

Liverpool had the largest number of the non-homegrown players in their squad, and were the only team in the league to reach the 17 player cap.

No ‘big six’ club has more than 40 per cent homegrown players, though Wolves have the lowest proportion, at only 21.1 per cent.

Understandably, newly promoted sides will be facing no issues. Bournemouth lead the way, with only four players not considered homegrown last season. Outside of the Championship graduates, Newcastle have the highest proportion of homegrown players with 60 per cent.

Will Liverpool face issues?

It may affect the rest of their business, especially after the signing of Uruguay international striker Darwin Nunez in a €75 million deal.

Liverpool signed Darwin Nunez from Benfica this summer (Photo: Getty Images)


Liverpool signed Darwin Nunez from Benfica this summer (Photo: Getty Images)
However, the potential sale of Sadio Mane to Bayern Munich should offset Nunez’s arrival, while Divock Origi’s departure has ensured that Liverpool are slated to have 16 non-homegrown players next season, one short of the upper limit.

Dutch centre-back Sepp van den Berg will still count as an Under-21 in 2022-23.

What about Chelsea?

Last season, Chelsea had 16 non-homegrown players, one short of the maximum allowed.

Owing to their recent takeover by a consortium led by Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital, Chelsea’s plans in the transfer window are among the murkiest of any of the top six.

Antonio Rudiger’s departure to Real Madrid helps somewhat — but his absence is counteracted by the return of Italian defender Emerson from a season-long loan.

Remember that Andreas Christensen counts as homegrown, so his exit does not impact Chelsea’s quota.

The club are allowed to loan players out to reduce the number of non-homegrown players in their squad.

Why are Tottenham in an awkward spot?

Returning loanees, new signings and the remorseless march of age.

Giovani Lo Celso and Tanguy Ndombele could return from spells at Villarreal and Lyon respectively (with Ndombele’s future up in the air), raising Tottenham’s total to 14.

Dejan Kulusevski will also no longer qualify as an Under-21 next season, although Bryan Gil does.

The club have also announced the signing of Ivan Perisic, while The Athletic has also reported the club’s interest in Richarlison in addition to the signing of Yves Bissouma.

Eric Dier is not considered homegrown after growing up in Portugal.

Eric Dier counts as an overseas player (Photo: Getty Images)


Eric Dier counts as an overseas player (Photo: Getty Images)
Despite Gollini’s departure, the hypothetical arrival of Richarlison along with Bissouma would raise Tottenham’s non-homegrown total to 17 — precisely on the limit.

As a further difficulty, UEFA’s rules for Champions League football dictate a maximum of 17 foreign players are allowed in Champions League squads — with Welshmen Ben Davies and Joe Rodon, and Irishman Matt Doherty, not counting as homegrown under those laws.

And Wolves?

Wolves are near the upper limit, but have been helped by the departure of Romain Saiss.

They have a small army of loanees returning, who will have to be managed once more, while Chiquinho, a breakthrough in the second half of last season, will no longer count as an Under-21.

Rayan Ait-Nouri and Fabio Silva are still too young to be featured in the quota.

Purposely posted here instead of transfer threads, slow news day didn't want to get people's hopes up.
 

Macho

Documenting your downfall 🎥
Dusted 🔻

Country: England

Where did clubs stand last season?

Ahead of the 2022-23 campaign, The Athletic looked at where each side stood last season.

State of Premier League clubs' squads

1655805881064.png
 

DanDare

Emoji Merchant and Believer-In-Chief
Trusted ⭐

Player:Saliba
GK - No issues
FB - Back ups are an issue but doubt we do anything about it
CB - White, Gabi and Saliba are a good rotating 3
CM - No Partey no party atm. Can Arteta make a midfield without him work?
Wings - Good especially if we add Raphina
AM - Ode + Vieira nice
Striker - Hold a lot of hope for Eddie. Not sure him and Jesus are enough....
 

Riou

In The Winchester, Waiting For This To Blow Over

Country: Northern Ireland

Player:Gabriel
Good squad...but not quite good enough for Champions League, and Arteta isn't really good enough yet to help us get it either...though you never know.

The CF situation is worrying, even if we get Jesus...still wish we just kept Auba, but changed our style a little.
 

Sparrahork

Active Member
GK - No issues
FB - Back ups are an issue but doubt we do anything about it
CB - White, Gabi and Saliba are a good rotating 3
CM - No Partey no party atm. Can Arteta make a midfield without him work?
Wings - Good especially if we add Raphina
AM - Ode + Vieira nice
Striker - Hold a lot of hope for Eddie. Not sure him and Jesus are enough....
Is there something I am missing regarding our need for a right winger?

At present we have Saka as undisputed first choice but I think we have some depth behind him and raphinha simply not needed.

To expand Pepe is still there, as is amn who could fill that role. I expect these to leave but is it not sensible to only buy after sold?

Going forward if we sign Jesus he can play rw. We definitely however have Reiss (who regained his form in early 2022), Fabio Vieira, martinelli and esr who can all fit in there. And that is before you go to the youth team!

Why do we need raphinha? Surely cm is more of a pressing position to spend big on the right player?
 

MartiSaka

Join my "Occupy A-M" movement here 🗳
Yep I don’t the recruitment in terms of the positions we are prioritising; a second out and out striker and another cm seems more of a priority than right attacker and other cb.
 

Multipass

Active Member
I think the point is that that arteta sees enough goals in nketiah, jesus, raphina, martinelli and saka - supported by the creativity of Ødegaard and viera - to mean he doesn’t need another out and out striker this year.

I wonder if his decision was helped by the vlahovic fiasco and the costs banded around for average strikers like dcl.
 

MauveGunner

Well-Known Member

Country: Belgium

Player:Rice
All in all the squad is more than ok to compete on all levels. But the lack of a proper Partey back-up is still worries me a lot.
 

AberGooner

Established Member
Trusted ⭐

Country: Scotland

Player:Gabriel
How does this look potentially?

View attachment 7439

I like that, some decent options in every position. As ever whether we'll get enough goals out of it is the biggest question mark.

I still fear having to play Elneny a substantial amount of games if Partey gets injured, probably the key to the team having any success is him staying fit. I'd say Xhaka probably still starts until we see differently as well. Perhaps Holding will go and hopefully their might be a place for Norton-Cuffy depending on how he does in pre-season.

Balogun should go on loan again as well.
 

Sparrahork

Active Member
I like that, some decent options in every position. As ever whether we'll get enough goals out of it is the biggest question mark.

I still fear having to play Elneny a substantial amount of games if Partey gets injured, probably the key to the team having any success is him staying fit. I'd say Xhaka probably still starts until we see differently as well. Perhaps Holding will go and hopefully their might be a place for Norton-Cuffy depending on how he does in pre-season.

Balogun should go on loan again as well.
I would think balogun has to stay on so many levels.

Not only will he get regular Europa and other cup experience, but it looks as if the CF striking options will be Eddie, martinelli, a.n. other and balogun.

Given martinelli is seen as a lw then simply for depth balogun has to stay. He will get chances on the pitch in the league.
 

Sparrahork

Active Member
For me the worry is that we may potentially be left with additional players who are surplus to requirements.

I hope we focus on the essential slots (CF then cm) and then only consider others if we have moved players on.

I will be in a minority but I would prefer raphinha to be shelved until Pepe has gone. Otherwise Pepe will only move on loan with us paying part of his wages too.

I personally however do not think we need raphinha and no idea why bidding for him at this time.
 

AberGooner

Established Member
Trusted ⭐

Country: Scotland

Player:Gabriel
I would think balogun has to stay on so many levels.

Not only will he get regular Europa and other cup experience, but it looks as if the CF striking options will be Eddie, martinelli, a.n. other and balogun.

Given martinelli is seen as a lw then simply for depth balogun has to stay. He will get chances on the pitch in the league.

I don't see Balogun getting much chances tbh, or enough that he needs at this point, hence it being better for him to be out on loan starting games somewhere. He'd have Jesus and Nketiah ahead of him and if anything happens to them there's a lot more chance of Martinelli or someone playing false 9 filling in, especially if it was a league or important knock out game.
 

Sparrahork

Active Member
I don't see Balogun getting much chances tbh, or enough that he needs at this point, hence it being better for him to be out on loan starting games somewhere. He'd have Jesus and Nketiah ahead of him and if anything happens to them there's a lot more chance of Martinelli or someone playing false 9 filling in, especially if it was a league or important knock out game.
I would think he will be at the club for the first half of the season regardless. I think he will get some chances in cup games and hopefully he takes them, so he once again becomes a genuine contender for Eddie's place in the match day squad.
 

AberGooner

Established Member
Trusted ⭐

Country: Scotland

Player:Gabriel
I would think he will be at the club for the first half of the season regardless. I think he will get some chances in cup games and hopefully he takes them, so he once again becomes a genuine contender for Eddie's place in the match day squad.

We'll see what happens. No doubt I'd like to see him get some matches in the league cup for example but I think it would be of more benefit to him and us if he was out on loan in the Championship continuing to develop.
 

Riou

In The Winchester, Waiting For This To Blow Over

Country: Northern Ireland

Player:Gabriel
Looks like top 4 ngl.

CF looks a bit light though with the forwards all kinda similar, needs a blunt instrument. RB also kind of underwhelming as it stands.

I like how Eddie is already Ghanian in this :lol:
 

Arsenal Quotes

I'm prepared to be committed to the club at least until we go into the new stadium. For me, it’s important that the club goes in there and that I make sure the team are at a very good level. After that, whether it’s me or someone else, the club will be able to compete at the highest level. But for me to run away now would not be fair.

Arsène Wenger after extending his contract on 2004
Top Bottom