No he is not. We would have made top 4 with any pl keeper last seasonRamsdale deserve to start our first CL game in ages, he's a big reason we're in the conpetition
No he is not. We would have made top 4 with any pl keeper last season
His xgoals saved says he conceded 5 more than he should have. He conceded a lot of soft goals last season. He was the worst performing keeper in the league this season after 4 games statistically before he was droppedNo we wouldn't. He save many points pulling off saves he had no right to be making (he single handed saves us a point against Pool. Earned PFA goalkeeper of the season and Yashin nomination in the process.
I had Ramsdale in our top 5 players last and our best performing player the season prior.
His xgoals saved says he conceded 5 more than he should have. He conceded a lot of soft goals last season. He was the worst performing keeper in the league this season after 4 games statistically before he was dropped
Hi all, doing a live watch-along on the YouTube channel for this, will stream it on Spotify after but feel free to join.
His peers voting on PFA and Yashin award nomination say very different.
Who judges goals? Surely each chance is different?
"am plagiarising from myself pretty much verbatim but xG or expected goals is basically a measure of chance quality. This is a very brief and clumsy explanation but every chance in a match can be given a value representing how likely a shot from that position or situation is to result in a goal. This is normally a value between 0 and 1, with 0 obviously being no chance and 1 being a 100% chance, or 0 being no goal expected and 1 being a certain goal. A shot from a position with a .1 value would suggest a 10% chance of goal from that position."
Judging on that snippet I quickly googled it seems they (whoever is that judges this) is still based on human opinion made out to be statistic reading that.
Footballers are dumb. It tells me he has a lot of mates and is well liked. So basically you refuse to acknowledge any goalkeeping stats because he is bad in all of them
We struggled against Xavi Simons and Gakpo, neither of whom are there anymore. We should make light work of them if we don't mess around.PSV is the most inform team out of these 3 opponents, playing very attractive football. Already struggled against them last season, but our best team at home should do it.
Would like to see Havertz against a Non-PL-Team. Somehow he needs some confidence.
We struggled against Xavi Simons and Gakpo, neither of whom are there anymore. We should make light work of them if we don't mess around.
I trust my eyes first, then if the stats back it even better. Before even looking at stats I was saying all of last season. Ramsdale lets in a lot of soft goals. Not howlers, but shots if keeper save you won’t say woow. A lot of his problems comes from being badly positioned. Perfect example KDB first goal when they beat us end of the season. 25 yard on his near post. Just a soft goal due too poor positioningI'm not refusing to acknowledge all GK stats. However passing off goals XP as a statistic when it's actually a subjective to the judge of the statistic. It's saying all VAR calls are correct, is which clearly there not.
Whoscored is another one. According to their statistics one season team of the season consisted of Monreal (no qualms with that) but also then Valencia, Tomkins and Mustafi. I mean FFS M.Antonio was in the team of the season the season prior to that as a RB!
They are the second best team in the group and they are flying right now. Very dangerousThink this PSV side is more dangerous than most think. That being said we should have too much for them.
A big part of me wants to see Rammers in goal. Say what you want but he started for the team that got us back into the Champions League. Ray can play the derby. Trossy in for Gabi and maybe Jesus in for Nketiah.
Don’t f*ck this up Mikel
Better not be hearing this again in six games time…