lomekian
Essays are my thing
Are you so thick that you can't understand my post?
Did I say anyone compared him to Viera?
Re-read my post and comprehend what I wrote
Ah, selective quoting, a bit like your selective comprehension. I know exactly what you wrote. I was merely drawing attention to your false argument hyperbole by echoing it. You've been banging on here with endless posts implying we're all saying he was brilliant and blowing smoke up his rear, when I've barely seen anything more strongly supportive than the team was better with him in it, as it has been most of the season, and he's our most important midfielder.
I haven't seen a single post suggesting we should build the team around him or that he is some sort of colossus that is the standard we should aspire to.
You and a couple of others are spitting feathers because other people rate him a little bit higher than you do, which inevitably leads to people defending him a bit, which then leads to you inflating their points of view so you try to suggest the counter view is ridiculous. When in actuality, the counter view is purely one of degree and not extremes.
We're aware of each others viewpoints, so there is no need to be dishonest in representing differing views.
Back on topic, the real question is this:
If Xhaka is currently our most important midfielder, how do we rebuild our midfield to make it better in the knowledge that we have limited funds, and how do we long-term transition to a point where Xhaka becomes a player we can sell or drop without leaving a chaotic mess in his absence?