YuenBiaoFan
Established Member
4-4-2 with Ade starting I'm sure of it.
That worries me a lot: the Reading game says absolutely nothing about the efectiveness of our 4-5-1 (especially against tight defences/ defensive teams).patrick42uk said:no point trying to paint a pretty picture. emirates is no fortress. would be more confident away. plus, we havent scored in 3 games from open play. i think this will actually make us more cautious in our approach. IMO the score could be anything from 0-0, 1-1, or 1-0 to liverpool.
wenger has shown a bit of faith with the front five which did well against reading. i wonder if he'll take the opportunity to re-instate ade. i was impressed with his play against west ham. constantly working hard, moving off the ball to give passing options to the midfield short or in behind. a bit of change in personnel could do us good.
I agree. This in turn will allow us to tackle higher up the pitch and be further up the pitch when we regain possession making it that much quicker for us to counter attack them. Also if we do lose possession all our back four of Eboue, Toure, Gallas, and Clichy have great, if not blistering recovery pace. Also apart from Pennant who is very quick (but even then he'll be up against Clichy which equals no contest), I don't see any of their players being able to really to get past our defence and make a clean break for our goal without any of our players biting at their heels.leonardo santiago said:I expect us to play 4-5-1 (I would prefer sabre's line-up). Imo RVP should be in the team and play right winger in stead of left winger. Hleb can play left winger. RVP will be 10 times as dangerous and show his full potential, Hleb's move will hardly affect his game.
In a low scoring game like this, a RVP set piece could win us the match. That's another reason why he should play.
I expect Pool to play 4-4-2. Rafa has realised Kuyt is his best attacking player. Crouch will be his partner.He and especially Kuyt are very dangerous at set pieces. Therefore we should defend as high up the pitch as possible (not that dangerous, Pool lack pace up front with that line up), so Pool will get as little corners and dangerous set pieces as possible.
Exactly.Loyan said:I agree. This in turn will allow us to tackle higher up the pitch and be further up the pitch when we regain possession making it that much quicker for us to counter attack them. Also if we do lose possession all our back four of Eboue, Toure, Gallas, and Clichy have great, if not blistering recovery pace. Also apart from Pennant who is very quick (but even then he'll be up against Clichy which equals no contest), I don't see any of their players being able to really to get past our defence and make a clean break for our goal without any of our players biting at their heels.leonardo santiago said:I expect us to play 4-5-1 (I would prefer sabre's line-up). Imo RVP should be in the team and play right winger in stead of left winger. Hleb can play left winger. RVP will be 10 times as dangerous and show his full potential, Hleb's move will hardly affect his game.
In a low scoring game like this, a RVP set piece could win us the match. That's another reason why he should play.
I expect Pool to play 4-4-2. Rafa has realised Kuyt is his best attacking player. Crouch will be his partner.He and especially Kuyt are very dangerous at set pieces. Therefore we should defend as high up the pitch as possible (not that dangerous, Pool lack pace up front with that line up), so Pool will get as little corners and dangerous set pieces as possible.
I stand corrected. I mentioned the wrong examples. But I still think our performance against Reading with 4-5-1 says **** all about it's effectiveness v a parked bus.patrick42uk said:leo, you seem to forget we played 4-4-2 against villa and boro. in fact, we actually moved a forward wider to try to break teams down because two players central wasnt working for us.
to my surprise too. Even if we play 4-5-1 and they play 4-4-2 I expect more danger from their wingplay than from ours.cubbz_th14 said:just been reading on a scouser forum about their views and the general feeling i get is that they don't seem too confident for this game many have gone on about our ability on the wing (much to my surprise) although i see hleb doing some damage on the right with his exceptional ability to cut in.
i just hope we can score early and open the game up and hope luck's on our side this time unlike the cska game
leonardo santiago said:to my surprise too. Even if we play 4-5-1 and they play 4-4-2 I expect more danger from their wingplay than from ours.cubbz_th14 said:just been reading on a scouser forum about their views and the general feeling i get is that they don't seem too confident for this game many have gone on about our ability on the wing (much to my surprise) although i see hleb doing some damage on the right with his exceptional ability to cut in.
i just hope we can score early and open the game up and hope luck's on our side this time unlike the cska game
Actually I fear their fullbacks (Finnan and Riise) will have a license to roam if we play 4-5-1.
Hleb and Rosicky certainly are no wingers. RVP plays right winger very well for Holland can't see why he couldn't do that for us.cubbz_th14 said:leonardo santiago said:to my surprise too. Even if we play 4-5-1 and they play 4-4-2 I expect more danger from their wingplay than from ours.cubbz_th14 said:just been reading on a scouser forum about their views and the general feeling i get is that they don't seem too confident for this game many have gone on about our ability on the wing (much to my surprise) although i see hleb doing some damage on the right with his exceptional ability to cut in.
i just hope we can score early and open the game up and hope luck's on our side this time unlike the cska game
Actually I fear their fullbacks (Finnan and Riise) will have a license to roam if we play 4-5-1.
Funnily, Eboue i feel does best on the wing for us when he makes those runs. Freddie can volunteer to run all day but i just cant see him to be effective any more. RVP, Hleb and Rosicky's can not naturally play using the wing. some times i do miss bobby, when on song he was a class act
leonardo santiago said:the resulting cross will be pretty harmless.
leonardo santiago said:the resulting cross will be pretty harmless.
If Ade's playing crosses will be more dangerous. I wouldn't be to worried about Henry with crosses (he hardly is at the right spot & heading is 1 of the few things he's not that good at). Gilberto will only be in the box for set-pieces (during normal play he will not be around).RocktheCasbah said:leonardo santiago said:the resulting cross will be pretty harmless.
I think both Eboue and Hoyte have shown good crossing ability in the last few weeks, and we know that Gilberto, Henry and Adebayor are all capable in the air- so I doubt that Rafa will be too relaxed about crosses into the box. Besides which, Arsenal have shown on occassion that you don't always have to cross aerially to score a goal.
I'm really, really looking forward to this, although we're not having the best of runs at the moment and the Pool look like they're beginning to wake up. Would be shocked if Crouch and Kuyt don't start for Liverpool, they'll expect to dominate whoever play in the centre for us (Toure and Gallas, I hope). So the onus is on our fullbacks to cut off the supply lines from the wings- if Clichy and Pennant play, that should be an interesting battle.
No Sissoko is good news for us, I think. But I just hope the lads remember where their shooting boots are, a week without a game for most of them will have done them the power of good. I expect us to come out fired up and I expect us to win.
kel varnsen said:Shadow Moses said:LuKaZaN said:But even if Sissoko is there, he doesn't actually do much other than give away alot of free kicks.
If Gerrard is there he's a threat on our goal.
I'm with Captain on this one. With Gerrard in the middle Cesc would have a field day with the space he leaves. Sissoko on the other hand would render Cesc useless with his physical game. We all saw how well it worked for NRC and his West Ham mates last Sunday
please, a cesc on form wouldn't have any problem with sissoko. cesc has come up against a number of top class defensive midfielders in the past without being 'rendered useless'. sissoko is a good player, but not the greatest defensive midfielder of all time...
sissoko brings a lot of effort, work rate, tenacity and grit to the liverpool midfield, but he also gives the ball away a lot and often in dangerous areas quite carelessly. in addition, he offers very little going forward. sissoko or no sissoko, we'll still beat liverpool comfortably. only difference is the way we'll beat them...
yep. A real pity because RVP and Rosicky deliver perfect balls. Somehow I feel that we practise far too little on offensive set pieces (defensive too). Seems all our players are there on their own, no one makes space for a another player, by a block, no trained patterns (like 3 players running forward and 1 dropping off to the space they just left, etc).cubbz_th14 said:leonardo santiago said:the resulting cross will be pretty harmless.
spot on. same applies to our corners
Not saying Gilberto doesn't occiasionally pop up. But for over 90% of the crosses from normal play he will not be there.RocktheCasbah said:Not true, he (Gilberto) does get forward, and amazingly enough, he does so to good effect from time to time. Don't forget that Henry has bagged a couple of headers recently, and the one against Porto was not the action of someone not that good at heading. I think it's more a delivery issue.
Though I am prepared to concede the law of averages... ;-)