SYS
Active Member
Walcott double 2-0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Arsenal manager Arsène Wenger admitted he is concerned by Granit Xhaka's disciplinary record ahead of Sunday's north London derby at home to Tottenham.
The Switzerland midfielder is in line to play against the Gunners' fierce local rivals for the first time, with Santi Cazorla likely to be still sidelined with an Achilles problem.
Of those four, Walcott is the closest to making it into contention to face Sp**s, while Cazorla is a doubt having not trained all week.
Class is permanent, form is temporary. Walcott's had a good period of form but he's not a top class player so I don't think his inclusion after injury should be automatic. Currently, form wise Ox has been making valuable contributions and Walcott has been injured. I'd like to see Walcott win his place back rather than have it handed back on the basis of 'merit' which really means 'good form'. Walcott is capable of being poor and wasn't good against Boro while Ox made a decisive contributions towards Arsenal returning to winning ways against Reading and Sunderland.
Bellerin seems to have been rested but not Walcott. Wenger's press conference suggests that Walcott still needs to prove his fitness to be included in the squad so I think we should see him on the bench if he makes it.
As much as I agree that Xhaka could cause us problems I feel Özil in that position leaves us completely exposed.I'd rather let Özil play the Cazorla-Role then letting Xhaka play against Sp**s. We got a lunatic on our hands here. Özil played that role against Italy in a friendly already and everybody was suprised how good we was at it. Put Alexis behind Giroud and have Iwobi left and Walcott right.
The "class is permanent, form is temporary " is valid for Ox as well. We are talking about Ox here...Not anywhere near a top class player.
As we speak now, Theo is, by large, a better contributor to Arsenal than Ox and has always been.
Anyway, let's agree that we disagree then. If Ox can force his way into the line up, more power to him. I just don't see it happening. We will see this week end and the rest of the season.
Where is Santi, and what have you done to him....
Wenger saving him for Utd and PSG i would like to believe
I think you overreacting, Xhaka is not a Shawcross or that bloke from Sunderland, he is a quality player who should be playing these games especially as Santi is absent, I presume Wenger will talk to him and we'll see what happen.I'd rather let Özil play the Cazorla-Role then letting Xhaka play against Sp**s. We got a lunatic on our hands here. Özil played that role against Italy in a friendly already and everybody was suprised how good we was at it. Put Alexis behind Giroud and have Iwobi left and Walcott right.
I think you overreacting, Xhaka is not a Shawcross or that bloke from Sunderland, he is a quality player who should be playing these games especially as Santi is absent, I presume Wenger will talk to him and we'll see what happen.
I'm well aware that "class is permanent, form is temporary " also applies to the Ox. I think I made that completely clear by describing why Ox is the man with the form and fitness over the very recent past, and in possession of the spot. At no point did I even vaguely suggest that Ox is a top class player. I just pointed out that Walcott certainly isn't proven top class. If we were discussing Özil, Alexis, Cazorla, Koscielny, Mustafi, Cech, the debate would be totally different.
It was you who said that Walcott should play based on "merit", when you should have said "form this season" or something like that...
I have a lot of doubts about both players' abilities to be consistent first-teamers at Arsenal because the squad has been being strengthened consistently for over 3 years now and if Özil and Alexis sign new contracts, then those wide positions could be the next place where some serious quality gets added. The Ox in particular will find it tough to establish himself having had less consistent game time. He's had a run of games, made valuable contributions, Walcott's fitness is in doubt. I think it's time to back the Ox and I have a feeling that Wenger might agree...
I'm well aware that "class is permanent, form is temporary " also applies to the Ox. I think I made that completely clear by describing why Ox is the man with the form and fitness over the very recent past, and in possession of the spot. At no point did I even vaguely suggest that Ox is a top class player. I just pointed out that Walcott certainly isn't proven top class. If we were discussing Özil, Alexis, Cazorla, Koscielny, Mustafi, Cech, the debate would be totally different.
It was you who said that Walcott should play based on "merit", when you should have said "form this season" or something like that...
I have a lot of doubts about both players' abilities to be consistent first-teamers at Arsenal because the squad has been being strengthened consistently for over 3 years now and if Özil and Alexis sign new contracts, then those wide positions could be the next place where some serious quality gets added. The Ox in particular will find it tough to establish himself having had less consistent game time. He's had a run of games, made valuable contributions, Walcott's fitness is in doubt. I think it's time to back the Ox and I have a feeling that Wenger might agree...
On merit was the correct saying.
Walcott: 244 apps 60 goals
Ox: 108 apps 8 goals
Think that's safe to say Theo has contributed more to the club than Ox. Not to mention, Walcott has missed 1 PL game. He's been one of our best players so far this season. Ox has a single assist to his name in the PL against the bottom club in the league. Theo has 5 goals and 2 assists. If he's fit then it's a no brainier for him to start over Ox.
Stats don't prove much without other information though do they?
Here's a stat. The last 3 Arsenal games
Ox - 2 goals, 1 assist, 3 wins
Walcott - 0 goals, 0 assists, 0 wins, 0 minutes
Of course Walcott has contributed more to the club, but he's never been fully convincing. They're at different stages of their career, and they reached those stages with a different level of player competition. At 23, Walcott wasn't having to compete with Alexis Sanchez, Iwobi, Lucas and and older version of himself.
5 goals and 2 assists from Walcott is good but he's has a lot more game time for the opportunity to make an impact than Ox, and Walcott remains a player with limitations and the ability to be inconsistent, didn't play well against Boro, which is why I'd like to see him earn his way back to a starting spot rather than having it handed to him automatically...
I'm shocked by some people's teams on here but all a matter of opinion I suppose!
For me - granted everybody is fit and healthy - there is only ONE position really up for grabs and that would be who partners Cazorla in CM. Xhaka could be in there being the better passer of the ball and for his height from set pieces against Sp**s. He would be able to deal with the high pressing maybe more capably than Coquelin.
Coquelin would thrive on the occasion of playing the NLD and would be able to help the defence out against the dangerous counters Sp**s will surely have.
I would slightly favour towards Coquelin, but wouldnt mind either.
Nacho had 1/2 bad games and people are making it out he's awful - he's still one of the top left backs in the league, by a long way! And he's far more reliable than Gibbs, who i would really worry about against the likes of Walker bombing down the right.
The Bellerin/Walcott combination is really developing and I think it's one we need to stick to provided they are both fit to play.
The Ox, Ramsey, Giroud or even Xhaka if winning are all great options to spring from the bench.
I will predict a hard fought and nervy 2-1 win.