sabret00the
Established Member
i'm saying he was poor because he was some sort of bergkamp clone today and not the goal threat this club so desperately needs. i'm not judging him by what he done. but by what he failed to do given his role. of course there's always margin for error in this method of judgement down to the fact that we don't know what the manager told him to do.lagosgooner said:sabret00the said:true his link up game was superb, but let's be honest, as a striker that's not what wins you games. granted in a team as inadequate as this one, someone has to be the one to try and paper over the cracks, but it's not enough. his job is to provide a goal threat first and foremost and not having a single shot at goal (from open play) for a striker, is just unacceptable.Gurgen said:kel varnsen said:a bit like the liverpool match. same result, but the actual performance wasn't anything more than solid really. far from brilliant, as we didn't really create many chances from open play.
We didn't need to. We won this game fighting and if that's what it takes then that's what we'll have to do from now on.
Ade was brilliant today.
Also disagree that RvP was poor. He played a real team game today, linked play superbly and won the second penalty with some cheeky play.
are you saying he was poor or he wasn't played to his strengths?