PL: Arsenal v West Ham United | April 22, 2018 13:30 BST | Sky Sports

[Hunta]

Wenger on the board, lovely stuff.

 

[Ceballinhos]

I'm just wondering why Wenger doesn't play Per at all.
Koscielny and him were by far our best CB partnership for the last 10 years.

 

[rich 1990]

Solid? Lol the guy was clearly the best player on the pitch. Dominant.

He was ****. We had zero class on the pitch til Aubs came on.

 

[krengon]

I'm just wondering why Wenger doesn't play Per at all.
Koscielny and him were by far our best CB partnership for the last 10 years.

Even Per is praying he doesn't have to play another minute lol.

 

[Trilly]

Nice spin......Keep pushing your pointless narrative.

1. I relayed two things that I saw on my television and called them facts (which they were)

2. You in your frenzied ‘defend Wenger at all costs’ state waded in and called me deluded for relaying information? :/

3. I explained the misunderstanding to you and you respond by saying I’m pushing a pointless narrative.

Think anyone would agree that you’re being a bit of a **** here. You need a lesson or three in humility.

 

[<<reed>>]

I'm just wondering why Wenger doesn't play Per at all.
Koscielny and him were by far our best CB partnership for the last 10 years.

You probably missed the game vs Nottingham Forest in the FA Cup

 

[Gooner Zig]

He was ****. We had zero class on the pitch til Aubs came on.

Mate you're a such a weirdo I don't know whether you take the piss or a legit. If you're legit there - watch the game again.

 

[El Granit-Coq]

That's not a fact, that's Ornstein's speculation.

Fair enough if that's true, but he is a lot closer to Arsenal than any of these lot. There is a lot more going on the "it's his decision" than he was sacked.

Either way, we need to just leave it be until something concrete comes along.

 

[Ceballinhos]

You probably missed the game with Nottingham Forest in the FA Cup

I haven't. He wasn't good but I'd rather give 5 games to Per to find some fitness back and a decent level (he was unreal last year during the final) than give any more games to Mustafi.

 

[Yousif Arsenal]

AfTV will always divide the fans even with new manager I don't blame them but I blame the stupid people who listen to the crap AFTV say. What knowledge does Claude Tropz DT have outside the PL? they can't even pronounce managers players name right ffs

 

[rich 1990]

Mate you're a such a weirdo I don't know whether you take the piss or a legit. If you're legit there - watch the game again.

Being serious. He was complete crap in the first half and improved a tad in the second. But our midfield is so ****. Ramsey was the only midfielder capable of producing today.

 

[Trilly]

No those are not facts... Those are opinions.

Here is a fact, the man wanted to hang it up but knew we weren't ready to get a replacement in. So think about that first.

Think you misread.

I did not say that Wenger being pushed out was a fact. I am saying that those two things happened. I literally sat here and saw it happen. What exactly are you disputing here?

If I call Rich a wasteman, he may not be a wasteman but it’s a fact that I called him a wasteman.

Poor example though because everyone knows Rich is a wasteman.

P.s. just noticed in this same very post you presented an opinion as a fact. Awkward?

 

[Gooner Zig]

Being serious. He was complete crap in the first half and improved a tad in the second. But our midfield is so ****. Ramsey was the only midfielder capable of producing today.

Pull the other one. He was excellent for the entire 90 minutes. Ramsey was awful for just about the whole game. Had a great last 15 or so minutes.

Seriously what game were you watching mate?

 

[Trilly]

He's confusing facts with statements of opinions and/or non-statements.

No, you just can’t read. Apparently.

(Banter btw but see the above post)

 

[A_G]

Mate you're a such a weirdo

If I call Rich a wasteman, he may not be a wasteman but it’s a fact that I called him a wasteman.

Poor example though because everyone knows Rich is a wasteman

 

[rich 1990]

Think you misread.

I did not say that Wenger being pushed out was a fact. I am saying that those two things happened. I literally sat here and saw it happen. What exactly are you disputing here?

If I call Rich a wasteman, he may not be a wasteman but it’s a fact that I called him a wasteman.

Poor example though because everyone knows Rich is a wasteman.

**** off, window cleaner.

 

[Hunta]

Stoke are getting relegated.

What a lovely day.

 

[rich 1990]

Pull the other one. He was excellent for the entire 90 minutes. Ramsey was awful for just about the whole game. Had a great last 15 or so minutes.

Seriously what game were you watching mate?

I don't know what game you were watching either, tbh. Xhaka had one shot and strolled around for the rest of it. When El Neny went off, we had a really dodgy patch. Ramsey wasn't brilliant but he had quality moments.

 

[carlito'sway]

1. I relayed two things that I saw on my television and called them facts (which they were)

2. You in your frenzied ‘defend Wenger at all costs’ state waded in and called me deluded for relaying information? :/

3. I explained the misunderstanding to you and you respond by saying I’m pushing a pointless narrative.

Think anyone would agree that you’re being a bit of a **** here. You need a lesson or three in humility.

Dude, again you don't know what facts mean. As others pointed out, you are confusing facts with opinions. You are conflicting them with your narrative and you have been doing it since yesterday. You are so transparent.
By the way, is that your pic in the profile, I always wanted to know what a douchebag looked like!

 

[El Granit-Coq]

Think you misread.

I did not say that Wenger being pushed out was a fact. I am saying that those two things happened. I literally sat here and saw it happen. What exactly are you disputing here?

If I call Rich a wasteman, he may not be a wasteman but it’s a fact that I called him a wasteman.

Poor example though because everyone knows Rich is a wasteman.

P.s. just noticed in this same very post you presented an opinion as a fact. Awkward?

You can't go on to acknowledge what you said is not factual yet cling on to the fact that you said it. That makes no sense in relaying facts.

I'm honestly trying to wrap my head around what you're saying. So far from the example, you are saying that the things you posted were not factual, but it's a fact that those things were said...?