Joestlaachmkr
Active Member
I just wonder why do you consider Pep to be overrated? Dont you think there`s a reason why he has only managed "superior" teams? The reason why Pep got the Barca job in 2008 was because he had won 23 games in a row with Barcelona B and february 2008 Barcelona with Ronaldinho, Giuly, Eto`o, Xavi and Iniesta on the team played a friendly against Pep`s Barcelona B, Barcelona won the game 2-1 but Barca B had the ball 58% of the game and created more passes during the game than what Rijkaard`s Barca did. When Pep took over Barcelona he sold most of the key players from the Rijkaard era and built up his own team at Barcelona within 1 year after he got the job. Pep has been lucky by taking over the right clubs at the right time, but you are not one of the most dominant managers in the history of football by money and luck. Mancini and Pellegrini also won the league with City but none of them was even close of winning the league with so many points or by taking so many wins in a row as Pep has done. Besides that, both Pellegrini and Mancini are world class managers.Besides, for what it’s worth, I consider Pep overrated anyways. He has only ever managed superior teams in their respected leagues and at Barcelona he inherited one of the best player materials ever seen. Two PL titles at City in four years? Even Pellegrini and Mancini won titles with that financial backing.
Last edited: