Player Ratings - PL: Arsenal vs Portsmouth | 02/09/07

[Jameel46]

Almunia - 7: made good saves and was only half a second late in reacting to Kanu's 'shot'

Toure - 8
Senderos - 5.5: sending off was harsh but didn't look too impressive anyway
Flamini - 7
Clichy - 7

Hleb - 6
Gilberto - 6.5: did well in both positions
Fabregas - 8.5: getting better and better
Rosicky - 7

VP - 6: not a great start to the season
Adebayor: 7: caused trouble but still can't get the final ball right
------------------------------------------------
Diaby - 6.5
Denilson - 6
Eduardo - n/a: not much time to do anything

 

[awooga83]

Here is the ratings from the Times

Almunia - 6

Flamini - 6
Toure - 6
Senderos - 4.
Clichy - 6

Hleb - 7
Gilberto - 6
Fabregas - 8
Rosicky - 6

RvP - 7
Adebayor - 6

SUBS:
Diaby - 6.
Denilson -6
Eduardo - No rating

Some strange ratings I must say.

 

[the dawn raids]

Rosicky - 8 Much better from Rosicky. Another goal and a great performance. Worked tirelessly after Senderos got sent off to ensure we came away with 3 points. Let's just hope he can stay fit!

agreed, one of if not his best performances for us. i was critical of him going forward against city but he more than played the part sunday when needed.

i havent been around since saturday so i imagine this has been discussed tirelessly, but i was disappointed adebayor. he did have a good game, but he had more than enough chances to make it a superb performance and he didnt take them as usual. he slowed up movements several times, kept needlessly playing the ball sideways and backwards. and all he had to do was stick his foot out and he wouldve had that goal in the first half. i know its been beaten to death, but he just doesnt seem to have the predatory instinct.

and im sorry, but do we really need smiley ratings? :roll:

 

[MDGoonah41]

Ok folks, if you haven't done so yet, and you still want to, get your ratings in soon, as I'm going to compile everything later tonight.

 

[banduan]

and im sorry, but do we really need smiley ratings? :roll:

You don't.

In Soviet Arsenal, smiley rating needs YOU!

 

[MDGoonah41]

First off, a record 37 posters gave their ratings, much appreciated. This week's ratings, in two parts.

Part 1

For a larger, easier to read version, click here

Part 2

For a larger, easier to read version, click here

Here is the overall chart after 4 matches

 

[RC8]

Terrific work MDGoonah41. Much appreciated, really.

 

[ronitc]

Cheers, thanks for this.

Something interesting you could look at is which poster consistently has the highest overall ratings and which gives the lowest. Not necessary for every game of course but maybe once every 5 games.

 

[Lukazan]

Brilliant work once again!

 

[stiiphunn]

Wow, great work! Much appreciated!

 

[Alfonso]

And the poster of the month award goes to..

Well done MD!

 

[M+D]

Great work MD, how long did that take you?! :shock:

 

[RC8]

Cheers, thanks for this.

Something interesting you could look at is which poster consistently has the highest overall ratings and which gives the lowest. Not necessary for every game of course but maybe once every 5 games.

You can see from the totals that I'm usually the one with the highest ratings, together with Lancelot, GunnerGH and Sashakal.

Those with the lowest ratings were Bazza afc, Lukazan, and Kel.

 

[ronitc]

Yes I know this.

What I meant was an average total rating across a number of games. Difficult to do as some don't rate subs but possible if only including ratings for starters.

 

[MDGoonah41]

Cheers, thanks for this.

Something interesting you could look at is which poster consistently has the highest overall ratings and which gives the lowest. Not necessary for every game of course but maybe once every 5 games.

Yep, was planning on that. Here are the average totals for people who have posted their ratings for all 4 games, and then those who posted their ratings for at least 3 games.

Great work MD, how long did that take you?! :shock:

About 30 minutes per week.

 

[MDGoonah41]

One more tidbit. The 3 highest scores in terms of totals for the 4 weeks

GoonerGH, 102.0 points v Portsmouth
sashakal, 101.5 points v Portsmouth
Lancelot/RC8, 100 points v Portsmouth

3 lowest scores

goonergurjit% 64.0 points v Man City
kaids%, 64.5 points v Man City
bluenaz*, 65.5 points v Blackburn


% didn't rate Sagna, Eduardo or Song
* didn't rate Gallas, Bendtner, or Denilson

 

[Clrnc]

you deserve something out of your hard work. well done

wow, i see i am very critical for fulham match, avg for blackburn and pompey, but highest for mancity.

intersting stats there

 

[Kilgallon]

Great work MDGoonah.

If I wasn't such a lazy sod I'd give you a hand with all the stats work... 8)

 

[Pepe LeFrits]

I presume the guys with average scores of close to 100 rated 14 players as opposed to 11? I'm not that scabby!

Consistently lower than Kel though, blimey... Probably as I consider 5 as average, not 6.

Any chance of adding mean player ratings per poster (total rating divided by the number of players rated)?

 

[Jameel46]

bit harsh on lehmann to get an average of 4.5 and 4.0 because of one mistake in each game.