- Thread starter
- #61
DanDare. Can't you see the posters' names?Who said this?
DanDare. Can't you see the posters' names?Who said this?
DanDare. Can't you see the posters' names?
No I mean who said that Rúnar should be 3rd choice?
Nope. Go back to the transfer rumors. We continued to pursue Raya after the Runarsson purchase.Would believe this more if it was said in August.
This sounds like Arteta and Edu know they ****ed up with this terrible signing and are trying damage control.
Romero is or was Argentina’s #1. Runarsson was statistically one of the worst keepers in France.Oh, and before anybody gives me this "Runarsson on 40k is ridiculous for third choice" bullshit, Romero is on 70K as third choice and Grant is on 30K as fourth choice.
I'm sure you all have your desperate reasons to argue back with. Save it.
Included Grant on purpose to balance that point.Romero is or was Argentina’s #1. Runarsson was statistically one of the worst keepers in France.
Grant’s value comes from his HG status.Included Grant on purpose to balance that point.
So we add Woodman and it means nothing. Romero isn't HG.Grant’s value comes from his HG status.
It means wasting a non-HG spot on a poor 3rd choice keeper on relatively big wages.So we add Woodman and it means nothing.
Never see this guy play before but he can’t be worse than Runarsson.
What is it with Arsenal and attracting Icelandic freaks?
Those wages are peanuts these days. And we're fine on HG.It means wasting a non-HG spot on a poor 3rd choice keeper on relatively big wages.